2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabecular bone scales allometrically in mammals and birds

Abstract: Many bones are supported internally by a latticework of trabeculae. Scaling of whole bone length and diameter has been extensively investigated, but scaling of the trabecular network is not well characterized. We analysed trabecular geometry in the femora of 90 terrestrial mammalian and avian species with body masses ranging from 3 g to 3400 kg. We found that bone volume fraction does not scale substantially with animal size, while trabeculae in larger animals' femora are thicker, further apart and fewer per u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
205
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
27
205
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Structurally, this can be achieved by improving trabecular bone architecture. However, allometric studies have shown that the scaling factor of trabecular thickness and numbers, although variable among species, always exhibit hypoallometry with animal size [33][34][35][36]. These values indicate that as body mass increases, the trabecular architecture becomes relatively sparser, with relatively thinner trabeculae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structurally, this can be achieved by improving trabecular bone architecture. However, allometric studies have shown that the scaling factor of trabecular thickness and numbers, although variable among species, always exhibit hypoallometry with animal size [33][34][35][36]. These values indicate that as body mass increases, the trabecular architecture becomes relatively sparser, with relatively thinner trabeculae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the primary goal of the present analysis was to investigate structural differences between the human foragers and agriculturalist groups, and only secondarily to analyze interspecific differences in trabecular bone microstructure, phylogenetic correction was not performed. Recent work has found minimal phylogenetic effects on bone microstructure (66,77).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, reconciling these strepsirhine lumbar vertebral body data with other comparative and scaling studies is challenging. Studies vary in trabecular morphometric approaches (three-dimensional direct transformation, two-dimensional plate model, and twodimensional direct measures), taxonomic samples, target bones, the size variable used to determine allometric equations (femoral head radius, estimated body mass from skeletal dimensions, and published species body mass averages) and scaling results (Mullender et al, 1996;Swartz et al, 1998;Fajardo and Mü ller, 2001;MacLatchy and Mü ller, 2002;Ryan and Ketcham, 2002;Fajardo et al, 2007b;Cotter et al, 2009;Ryan and Walker, 2010;Doube et al, 2011). The few studies that have investigated comparative strepsirhine trabecular bone architecture have not assessed the scaling relationships quantitatively.…”
Section: Strepsirhine Vertebral Body Microstructural Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies of primate proximal femur trabeculae have suggested that Tb.Th is invariant with body mass (MacLatchy and Mü ller, 2002;Ryan and Ketcham, 2002;Fajardo et al, 2007b). In contrast, broad mammalian studies suggest that Tb.Th scales with negative allometry in the femur and humerus (Swartz et al, 1998;Doube et al, 2011). However, the Tb.Th scaling exponents are generally isometric for chiropteran proximal femora and humeri (Swartz et al, 1998), suggesting that within mammals scaling exponents may differ depending on the level of taxonomic resolution or locomotor behavior of the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%