TRAAC framework for regulatory acceptance and wider usability of tools and methods for safe innovation and sustainability of manufactured nanomaterials

Abstract

There has been an unprecedented use of advanced materials, particularly manufactured nanomaterials, in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors in the last two decades. It has instigated concerns about the sustainability, in particular, risks and uncertainties regarding the interactions of the manufactured nanomaterials with humans and the environment. Consequently, significant resources in Europe and beyond have been invested into the development of tools and methods to support risk mitigation and risk management, and thus facilitate the research and innovation process of the manufactured nanomaterials. The level of risk analysis is increasing, including assessment of socio-economic impacts, and sustainability aspects, moving from a conventional risk-based approach to a wider safety-and-sustainability-by-design perspective. Despite these efforts on tools and methods development, the level of awareness and use of the majority of such tools and methods by stakeholders is limited. Issues of user-friendliness, trust, implementation training, regulatory or authority compliance needs, regulatory acceptance and unsuitability to the users’ needs are some of the factors which have been traditionally known to hinder their widespread use. Therefore, a framework is presented to quantify the readiness of different tools and methods towards their wider regulatory acceptance and downstream use by different stakeholders. The framework diagnoses barriers which hinder regulatory acceptance and wider usability of a tool/method based on their Transparency, Reliability, Accessibility, Applicability and Completeness (TRAAC framework). Each TRAAC pillar consists of criteria which help in evaluating the overall quality of the tools and methods for their (i) compatibility with regulatory frameworks and, (ii) usefulness and usability for end-users, through a calculated TRAAC score based on the assessment. Fourteen tools and methods were assessed using the TRAAC framework as proof-of-concept. The results provide insights into any gaps, opportunities, and challenges in the context of each of the 5 pillars of the TRAAC framework.

Articles, software, data: An Open Science ethological study

“…But these efforts are still far from achieving their final goals, as there do remain numerous difficulties and barriers. For example, in [77], one of the results of the the EU funded project EU NMBP-13 H2020 Gov4Nano, it is described the TRAAC framework standing over five pillars named Transparency, Reliability, Accessibility, Applicability and Completeness, in the Nanomaterials context, a framework . .…”