Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by expansion of a polyglutamine
(polyQ) repeat in the huntingtin protein. A structural basis for the apparent transition
between normal and disease-causing expanded polyQ repeats of huntingtin is unknown. The
‘linear lattice’ model proposed random-coil structures for both normal and
expanded polyQ in the preaggregation state. Consistent with this model, the affinity and
stoichiometry of the anti-polyQ antibody MW1 increased with the number of glutamines. An
opposing ‘structural toxic threshold’ model proposed a conformational
change above the pathogenic polyQ threshold resulting in a specific toxic conformation for
expanded polyQ. Support for this model was provided by the anti-polyQ antibody 3B5H10,
which was reported to specifically recognize a distinct pathologic conformation of soluble
expanded polyQ. To distinguish between these models, we directly compared binding of MW1
and 3B5H10 to normal and expanded polyQ repeats within huntingtin exon 1 fusion proteins.
We found similar binding characteristics for both antibodies. First, both antibodies bound
to normal, as well as expanded, polyQ in huntingtin exon 1 fusion proteins. Second, an
expanded polyQ tract contained multiple epitopes for antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) of
both antibodies, demonstrating that 3B5H10 does not recognize a single epitope specific to
expanded polyQ. Finally, small angle X-ray scattering and dynamic light scattering
revealed similar binding modes for MW1 and 3B5H10 Fab-huntingtin exon 1 complexes.
Together, these results support the linear lattice model for polyQ binding proteins,
suggesting that the hypothesized pathologic conformation of soluble expanded polyQ is not
a valid target for drug design.