1990
DOI: 10.1016/0304-5102(90)85212-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TPR studies of the effects of preparation conditions on supported nickel catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
75
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
14
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four peaks were identified (Table 1) for the former case: a small ill-defined peak at T, , = 528 K, which has been ascribed (45) to an endothemic phase transition from rhombohedra1 to cubic NiO which occurs simultaneously with reduction; a minor (573 K) and a major (610 K) peak, which can be attributed to the process H, + NiO + H20 + Ni where the minor peak (with a T, , , similar to that for bulk NiO) is associated with the reduction of very weakly interacting NiO and the higher temperature peak represents the reduction of NiO which interacts to a greater extent with the canier; and a broad peak with T, , = 693 K, which may be due to the more difficult reduction of a surface nickel silicate species. The reduction of the precalcined sample generated a small peak at T,, = 503 K, which is thought to be due to the reduction of traces of Ni(II1) oxide (43), and a broad peak at T, , , = 658 K with a shoulder, which can be considered to represent the reduction of both surface NiO and nickel silicate. As with the HPD catalysts, the introduction of the calcination step shifted the T, , of the principal peak to a higher value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four peaks were identified (Table 1) for the former case: a small ill-defined peak at T, , = 528 K, which has been ascribed (45) to an endothemic phase transition from rhombohedra1 to cubic NiO which occurs simultaneously with reduction; a minor (573 K) and a major (610 K) peak, which can be attributed to the process H, + NiO + H20 + Ni where the minor peak (with a T, , , similar to that for bulk NiO) is associated with the reduction of very weakly interacting NiO and the higher temperature peak represents the reduction of NiO which interacts to a greater extent with the canier; and a broad peak with T, , = 693 K, which may be due to the more difficult reduction of a surface nickel silicate species. The reduction of the precalcined sample generated a small peak at T,, = 503 K, which is thought to be due to the reduction of traces of Ni(II1) oxide (43), and a broad peak at T, , , = 658 K with a shoulder, which can be considered to represent the reduction of both surface NiO and nickel silicate. As with the HPD catalysts, the introduction of the calcination step shifted the T, , of the principal peak to a higher value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calcination step, in effect, removed the low temperature peak and stabilized the unreduced surface nickel, possibly by eliminating some of the structural water of the hydrosilicate species and making it more difficult to reduce. In contrast to the HPD technique, catalyst preparation by impregnation has received considerable attention (41)(42)(43)(44). The TPR profiles generated during the direct reduction and precalcination-reduction of the impregnated catalyst are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported [24] that the nickel oxide powders showed a single reduction peak at 300-400°C. In [25] Brynmor Mile reported that there were two kinds of the reducible nickel oxide on SiO 2 support. One resembling bulk NiO located mainly in the small pores (\9 nm) has negligible interaction with the silica and easily to be reduced at low temperature.…”
Section: Catalysts Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TPR experiments were carried out to explore the extent of reducibility of nickel species and the metal-support interactions [55]. The reduction profiles of the calcined Ni/SBA-15 catalysts are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%