2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicology in international drug control—Prioritizing the most harmful, persistent and prevalent substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4-Methylenedioxy-U-47700 (trans- N -2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl)- N -methylbenzo[d] [ 1 , 3 ] dioxole-5-carboxamide; Table 2 ) is the latest compound of this series to be reported to the EMCDDA EWS having been detected in a single sample seized in Poland in April 2018 [ 101 ]. The stereochemistry of the sample was not determined.…”
Section: The Appearance Of Non-fentanil Novel Synthetic Opioids On Ilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4-Methylenedioxy-U-47700 (trans- N -2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl)- N -methylbenzo[d] [ 1 , 3 ] dioxole-5-carboxamide; Table 2 ) is the latest compound of this series to be reported to the EMCDDA EWS having been detected in a single sample seized in Poland in April 2018 [ 101 ]. The stereochemistry of the sample was not determined.…”
Section: The Appearance Of Non-fentanil Novel Synthetic Opioids On Ilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, necessary to take a risk assessment and harm reduction based approach to focus on those substances with the greatest prevalence and propensity for harm. Materials containing fentanyl and fentanils (fentanyl analogues) are considered by many the greatest concern due to their prevalence, potency and diversity [ 1 – 3 ]. There are also other non-fentanil novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) emerging across the illicit synthetic drug market, which adapt and diversify in a manner that is responsive to developments in the illicit drug supply chain and the new national and international legislation designed to disrupt them [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their unknown origins, compositions, and lack of regulation, the use of these substances presents risks of harm, including toxicity, overdose, and death. , These risks may be exacerbated when a drug sample has an unknown quantity or is adulterated via the addition of other pharmaceutically active compounds to dilute, bulk up, or otherwise improve the appearance and/or apparent quality of the product. Additional risk exacerbation occurs when a drug is mis-sold, e.g., counterfeited pharmaceuticals, , or when conventional illicit drugs, e.g., cocaine, MDMA, and ketamine, are adulterated with or substituted for structurally related analogues or novel psychoactive substances (NPS) such as synthetic cathinones, synthetic cannabinoids, or novel synthetic opioids such as fentanyl and its analogues . Due to their ever-increasing number and structural diversity (up to December 2020, 1047 NPS have been reported), the pharmacological properties of many NPS and their subsequent potential for adverse side effects are poorly understood. Therefore, to provide effective public health and harm reduction interventions at large public events, there is a need for rapid qualitative and quantitative identification and characterization of the drug substances and combinations that are in use, including NPS that have not previously been reported or characterized. , Information regarding the presence and/or concentrations/amounts of these substances and assessment of their potential adverse effects can then be relayed to relevant stakeholders, such as first aid and medical personnel, peer-based harm reduction workers, and/or event patrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With so many new potentially toxic substances emerging on the illicit market, analytical laboratories must make difficult decisions about which NPS to prioritize for the development of new assays. Generally, these decisions require individual scientists to consider and integrate multiple sources of information. , At the British Columbia Provincial Toxicology Centre (Vancouver, BC, Canada), for example, decisions about which reference materials to acquire are based on a compound’s reported national and international prevalence, its toxicity and forensic value, and clinician input. This information must be culled from a number of different sources, including the scientific literature, monographs, communications from public health agencies, and forensic databases, and then synthesized by experts in a subjective manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%