Toxicology in Australia: A Key Component of Environmental Health

Abstract

Managing public concerns relating to chemical exposures can consume substantial public health resources, particularly as the scientific basis around these issues is often contentious. Toxicology remains underrecognized as a public health discipline in Australia, although Australian toxicologists are making significant contributions from academia, government, and the commercial sector toward assessing the level of risk and protecting the community from environmental hazards. Internationally, the growth of environmental toxicology and the promotion of sound science in risk assessment as a basis for making regulatory decisions have been, to some extent, driven by the outcomes of the 1992 UNCED Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio Summit) and its Chapter 19 Agenda 21 activities. The promotion of safe chemical management practices and the need for global strengthening of capabilities in toxicology are among the initiatives of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety (IFCS), which was formed after the Rio Summit to manage these programs. This article describes some of the initiatives in capacity building that marked the development of environmental toxicology in Australia since 1992 in response to these international environmental health initiatives.

The Wild Life of Pesticides: urban agriculture, institutional responsibility, and the future of biodiversity in Sydney's Hawkesbury-Nepean River

“…Increasingly, governments and other organisations are realising the strategic value of urban agriculture (Mason & Knowd 2010) as it offers food security in the context of global financial volatility, transnational consolidation of food industries and retail supply chains, rising public health and infrastructure costs, natural disasters, climate change, carbon reduction, oil depletion, and ecosystem conservation and restoration. In Australia, the quality and quantity of fresh water is at the core of this strategic question, as population growth and environmental change ensure that clean water is becoming ever more precious (Priestly et al 2007).…”

Response to Letter to the Editor from Professors Priestly and Moore

“…These scientists work in areas of regulatory and environmental toxicology, as well as in academia and the commercial sector. A more comprehensive summary of these activities was published late in 2007, as an outcome of a July 2006 symposium "Environmental Toxicology in Australasia", organized by the Australian Centre for Human Health Risk Assessment (ACH-HRA) and Golders Associates (2,3). The symposium collated 33 papers from Australian toxicologists covering risk assessment of contaminated sites, water, and air, and 15 of these were published as full papers in a special issue of the Journal of Toxicology and EnVironmental Health.…”

Toxicology down under—A Different Perspective

“…These scientists work in areas of regulatory and environmental toxicology, as well as in academia and the commercial sector. A more comprehensive summary of these activities was published late in 2007, as an outcome of a July 2006 symposium “Environmental Toxicology in Australasia”, organized by the Australian Centre for Human Health Risk Assessment (ACHHRA) and Golders Associates , . The symposium collated 33 papers from Australian toxicologists covering risk assessment of contaminated sites, water, and air, and 15 of these were published as full papers in a special issue of the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health .…”