2001
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.19.5.1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicological testing of cytotoxic drugs (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the observed toxic effects after treatment with DTS-201 are typical of cytotoxic agents and are the same as those reported for free doxorubicin, but they occur at higher dose levels than with free doxorubicin (19). The main target organs of DTS-201 toxicity are bone marrow and the lymphoid tissues, the gastrointestinal tract and oral cavity, and the genital tract, as is the case for most cytotoxic anticancer agents and doxorubicin in particular (19). In rodents, the peripheral nervous system was also a key target, the animals systematically developing hind limb paralysis at toxic dose levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the observed toxic effects after treatment with DTS-201 are typical of cytotoxic agents and are the same as those reported for free doxorubicin, but they occur at higher dose levels than with free doxorubicin (19). The main target organs of DTS-201 toxicity are bone marrow and the lymphoid tissues, the gastrointestinal tract and oral cavity, and the genital tract, as is the case for most cytotoxic anticancer agents and doxorubicin in particular (19). In rodents, the peripheral nervous system was also a key target, the animals systematically developing hind limb paralysis at toxic dose levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…After two consecutive injections, the MTD was found to be 50 mg/kg (f150 mg/m 2 ) and 40 mg/kg (f240 mg/m 2 ) in mice and rats, respectively. Comparing these values to those of doxorubicin documented in the literature, DTS-201 seems to be at least three to four times less toxic in rodents (6,19) and up to 8 to 9-fold less toxic in the dog (16,20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Both neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells attempt to repair them. However, if unrepaired, DNA lesions may give rise to chromatid-type aberrations during S-phase and interfere with the transcription and replication of DNA, resulting in cytotoxic and mutagenic effects [3,4]. Growing evidence suggests that secondary neoplasms may arise as a late complication of successful chemotherapy [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quinones form the second largest class of antitumor agents approved for clinical use in the U.S.A. and several antitumor quinones are in different stages of clinical and preclinical development [1,2]. A common feature in quinone-containing drugs is their ability to undergo reversible redox reactions to form semiquinone and oxygen radicals [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semiquinone can also be formed by a conproportionation reaction between a quinone and a hydroquinone, reaction (1) (the opposite of reaction 1 is the semiquinone disproportionation reaction). (1) The antitumor effect of some quinone-containing drugs is known to be enhanced upon exposure to ultrasound [6,7]. A synergistic effect of cell killing for hematoporphyrin combined with ultrasound has been ascribed to the formation of the superoxide anion radical, O 2 ·− , because cell damage was suppressed by superoxide dismutase (SOD) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%