The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1002/jat.925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicological evaluation of an electrically heated cigarette. Part 3: Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mainstream smoke

Abstract: The in vitro toxicity of cigarette mainstream smoke from an electrically heated cigarette (EHC) with controlled combustion was compared with that of the standard University of Kentucky Reference Cigarette 1R4F. In the Salmonella reverse mutation assay, strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 were used in the absence and presence of a metabolic promutagen activation system (S9) to determine the mutagenic potential of the total particulate matter (TPM), which was collected on a glass-fiber filter. In the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This 90-day inhalation study on rats was conducted to assess and quantify the relative in vivo activity of EHC smoke compared with 1R4F smoke and to complement the analytical chemistry and cytotoxicity assays, which showed substantially lower yields of several tobacco smoke constituents of concern for the EHC (Stabbert et al, 2003) and a pronounced reduction in cytotoxicity (Tewes et al, 2003). As can be observed from various dose-response curves, several of the effects seen for the low-dose EHC and the lower doses of the 1R4F are only marginally different from the sham control group in this 6 h a day, 7 days per week exposure regimen; however, to use doses much higher than the highest 1R4F dose is not feasible because acute CO toxicity occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 90-day inhalation study on rats was conducted to assess and quantify the relative in vivo activity of EHC smoke compared with 1R4F smoke and to complement the analytical chemistry and cytotoxicity assays, which showed substantially lower yields of several tobacco smoke constituents of concern for the EHC (Stabbert et al, 2003) and a pronounced reduction in cytotoxicity (Tewes et al, 2003). As can be observed from various dose-response curves, several of the effects seen for the low-dose EHC and the lower doses of the 1R4F are only marginally different from the sham control group in this 6 h a day, 7 days per week exposure regimen; however, to use doses much higher than the highest 1R4F dose is not feasible because acute CO toxicity occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytotoxicity assay evaluates cell death and inhibition of cell growth in BALB/c 3T3 cells by measuring the uptake of neutral red (Tewes et al, 2003). This assay assesses the effects of the gas/vapor phase and the particulate phase separately and is considered to be an indicator of irritation in vivo.…”
Section: Smokingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical concept of the EHCSS and the chemical and biological properties have been described in earlier publications Stabbert et al, 2003;Terpstra et al, 2003;Tewes et al, 2003). A distinct feature of the EHCSS is that it only produces mainstream smoke and no sidestream smoke is emitted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%