2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicological effects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The uptake kinetics and mechanisms and the toxic responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-commercial grade GO and O-SWCNT, also induced ROS with a similar concentration to the one tested here, although the exposure time tested in both cases was 24 h instead of 2 h [52,54]. However, the oxidative stress provoked by MWCNT in yeast seem to be lower than that observed in the present study for GO and GOC or that previously observed for other carbon derived nanoparticles [53]. presence of both carbon nanoparticles.…”
Section: Determination Of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Cells Response To supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-commercial grade GO and O-SWCNT, also induced ROS with a similar concentration to the one tested here, although the exposure time tested in both cases was 24 h instead of 2 h [52,54]. However, the oxidative stress provoked by MWCNT in yeast seem to be lower than that observed in the present study for GO and GOC or that previously observed for other carbon derived nanoparticles [53]. presence of both carbon nanoparticles.…”
Section: Determination Of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Cells Response To supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The effect on S. cerevisiae viability of non-commercial grade graphene oxide nanoparticles was also tested in a recent study, and the fungus mortality was found to be close to 20% in the presence of 600 mg L −1 [52]. Also, the toxicological potential of other carbon nanomaterials toward S. cerevisiae was reported, such as multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) or oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes (O-SWCNTs), which induced significant yeast mortality at 400 mg L −1 (6.1%) and 188.2 mg L −1 (approximately 11%) respectively [53,54]. 49.7% when the material was present at the higher concentration.…”
Section: Determination Of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Cells Response To mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, no differences in viability were observed in the selected exposure conditions. Therefore, the selected GN seem to have low toxicity towards S. cerevisiae, being at least lower than that reported for other carbon nanomaterials, such as 2D-graphene oxide (GO), 1D-multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) or 1D-oxidized single-walled carbon nanotubes (O-SWCNTs), which induced significant yeast growth inhibition at lower concentrations (160, 400 and 188.2 mg L −1 respectively) 41,44,46,47 . The impact of 0D-fullerene nanoparticles (nC60) exposure to S. cerevisiae was also studied, with no apparent effect on the growth yield of the fungus, although the nC60 concentration used (31 mg L −1 ) was lower than that used in the previously described studies 48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To confirmt hat the disassembly of PLLf rom the rGO/(PLL/ PASP) 3 @DOX nanocomposites could further destroyt he membrane of HeLa cells, HeLa cells werei ncubated with pure PASP, free DOX and rGO/(PLL/PASP) 3 @DOXn anocomposites for 24 h. Trypan blue was then used to determine cell membrane integrity.T he trypan blue can only enter into cells with ab roken membrane and are revealed as ab lue mark under an optical microscope. [46,47] As shown in Figure S10, trypan blue could go into the HeLa cells incubated with free DOX and rGO/(PLL/ PASP) 3 @DOX, whereas it didn ot enter either the control group or HeLa cells incubated with pure PASP,i ndicating that the membrane of the HeLa cells was destroyedb yt he free DOX or rGO/(PLL/PASP) 3 @DOX. On the other hand, compared with free DOX, more trypanb lue enteredi nto the HeLa cells incubated with rGO/(PLL/PASP) 3 @DOX.…”
Section: Intracellular Uptake and Cell Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%