The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1991
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620100412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity tests of effluents with marsh plants in water and sediment

Abstract: Methods are described for toxicity testing of water and sediment with two varieties of the freshwater marsh plant Echinochloa crusgal/i (Linneaus) Palisot de Beauvois (Poaceae), and complex effluents. Two tests are described: a seed germination and early seedling growth test in water, and a survival and seedling growth test in natural and synthetic sediments. Effects of effluents from a sewage treatment plant, tannery, textile mill, pulp and paper mill, coking plant and sewage treatment plant included inhibiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prompted by the need for uncontaminated and nontoxic reference and dilution sediment, standard synthetic sediments have been developed [20,21]. Although synthetic sediments have been shown to support survival and growth of a variety of plants and animals [20][21][22], and have been used in toxicity tests [23][24][25], few bioaccumulation studies have been conducted in synthetic sediments [26,27]. Although it may be difficult to reproduce all the properties of a field-collected sediment [20,21], particularly those that affect bioavailability, synthetic sediments offer several advantages over natural sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prompted by the need for uncontaminated and nontoxic reference and dilution sediment, standard synthetic sediments have been developed [20,21]. Although synthetic sediments have been shown to support survival and growth of a variety of plants and animals [20][21][22], and have been used in toxicity tests [23][24][25], few bioaccumulation studies have been conducted in synthetic sediments [26,27]. Although it may be difficult to reproduce all the properties of a field-collected sediment [20,21], particularly those that affect bioavailability, synthetic sediments offer several advantages over natural sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it may be difficult to reproduce all the properties of a field-collected sediment [20,21], particularly those that affect bioavailability, synthetic sediments offer several advantages over natural sediments. They are free of contaminants and are reproducible [20,23,24], which allows comparison of results among tests. In contrast, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of natural sediments vary both spatially and temporally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one week's exposure in the field (August [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]1989), all boxes were retrieved. The top 2 crn of sediment from six replicates of each treatment was preserved in 10% buffered formalin with rose bengal for enumeration of invertebrates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material was milled to create a range of particle sizes. All source materials were similar to those of Walsh et al [23], although additional products and size separations were employed.…”
Section: Artificial Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be used as a control sediment, a formulated sediment should provide consistent and acceptable responses for a variety of test organisms, should be composed of materials that have consistent characteristics from batch to batch and that are commercially available, and should have contaminant concentrations that are below concentrations of concern. Previous studies with formulated sediments have evaluated a variety of test organisms, sources of sand, silt, and clay, and sources of organic carbon [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] (K.E. Day, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%