2012
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7609.1000e112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Challenges and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the on-going international shift away from vertebrate animal testing in toxicology, we envision testing in lower animal species will increase substantially in importance. For example, state of the art omics approaches (Bluemel 2012) are beginning to gain support by industry and regulators; such studies conducted on aquatic invertebrates such as Daphnia could utilise a miniaturised high throughput toxicity range finding experiment to first select appropriate exposure concentrations for the subsequent omics investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the on-going international shift away from vertebrate animal testing in toxicology, we envision testing in lower animal species will increase substantially in importance. For example, state of the art omics approaches (Bluemel 2012) are beginning to gain support by industry and regulators; such studies conducted on aquatic invertebrates such as Daphnia could utilise a miniaturised high throughput toxicity range finding experiment to first select appropriate exposure concentrations for the subsequent omics investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicity testing is particularly important when whole-cell screens (Tables 1 and 2) have been used for bioprospecting because, with the exception of some cell morphology-based assays and assays using under-expressing, over-expressing or reporter strains of bacteria, these screens do not distinguish between specific (bacterial) and nonspecific (general) cell toxicity (119). The number of in vitro assays available for toxicity testing has grown considerably in recent years and continues to grow, driven by public concern for animal welfare (169,170) and legislative control of animal use (171,172), and a desire on the part of pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies to reduce false-negative and false-positive test results caused by species-specific toxicity (173,174), to reduce the cost and duration of toxicity testing (171,175), to generate data for SAR analysis and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models (176), and to detect toxicity problems earlier in the drug development process (170,177).…”
Section: Toxicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%