2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of char residues produced in the co-pyrolysis of different wastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of previously demonstrated that the mobility of these heavy metals is suppressed in the extracted pyrolysis chars (Bernardo et al, 2010) the leachability of these heavy metals has to be monitored and strategies for removing them have to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In spite of previously demonstrated that the mobility of these heavy metals is suppressed in the extracted pyrolysis chars (Bernardo et al, 2010) the leachability of these heavy metals has to be monitored and strategies for removing them have to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was previously demonstrated that Zn mobility/leachability (Bernardo et al, 2010) is suppressed in the extracted pyrolysis chars. Also, previous studies (Hwang et al, 2007;Kistler et al, 1987) have shown that pyrolysis may have a positive effect on the immobilization of heavy metals in solid chars.…”
Section: Mineral Composition Of the Charsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A literature review revealed that the majority of articles that are related to end-of-life (EOL) tyres, when considering the new European Directive 2008/98/EC (European Union, 2008), focus mainly on technical solutions (Aiello et al, 2009;Aylón et al, 2010;Bernardo et al, 2010;Donatelli et al, 2010;Sang Son et al, 2011;Shulman, 2011;Singh et al, 2009). With regard to the application of this new directive, other articles are based on an assessment of waste management technologies according to the waste hierarchy identified in this Directive (Generowicz et al, 2011), or alternative treatment technologies that have been evaluated on their cost aspects, product utilization and compatibility with the EU waste framework that was proposed in the mentioned directive (Donatello et al, 2010;Grosso et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%