2000
DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200003000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of anticancer agents mediated by electroporation in vitro

Abstract: Electroporation is a physical event that temporarily reduces cell membrane barrier properties. Diminished membrane barrier properties are achieved by exposing cells to pulsed electric fields. When a cell has been treated with electric fields it is possible for extracellular agents to gain access to the cell interior. This process has been used in vivo to increase the uptake of chemotherapeutic agents by tumor cells which results in dramatically higher response rates than when drug is used alone. This type of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a dose-dependent, dramatic decrease in viability for all electroporated cell lines with half-maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) whereas EC 50 being 0.57 mmol/L Ca 2þ (range, 0.35-0.79 mmol/L) was not reached without electroporation. As expected, due to differences in, for example, cell size and homogeneity, there was a differential effect of the electroporation procedure alone on the different cell lines (12), as electroporation alone reduced viability by 0% (DC-3F), 6% (Lewis Lung Carcinoma), and 23% (K-562), respectively. Consequently, values are listed as a percentage of electroporated versus nonelectroporated controls, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…There was a dose-dependent, dramatic decrease in viability for all electroporated cell lines with half-maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) whereas EC 50 being 0.57 mmol/L Ca 2þ (range, 0.35-0.79 mmol/L) was not reached without electroporation. As expected, due to differences in, for example, cell size and homogeneity, there was a differential effect of the electroporation procedure alone on the different cell lines (12), as electroporation alone reduced viability by 0% (DC-3F), 6% (Lewis Lung Carcinoma), and 23% (K-562), respectively. Consequently, values are listed as a percentage of electroporated versus nonelectroporated controls, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…McNeil et al (36) and others (37,38) describe "scrape loading" as a means to transfer larger molecules across the cell membrane, but "scrape loading" of adherent A-NK cells with AP leads to heterogenous uptake and a significant loss of cells. Other techniques, such as red blood cell ghost fusion (39)(40)(41)(42) and electroporation (43)(44)(45)(46)(47) as a means to get enzymes across the cell membrane, also resulted in heterogeneous labeling and considerable cell loss when applied to the A-NK cells and were therefore not further pursued. In contrast, the ability of PTD to transduce A-NK cells with various molecules, such as FITC, AP, and beta-gal, was very impressive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Электрические импульсы со-здают трансмембранный потенциал в 0,5-1 В дли-тельностью 10 мкс -10 мс в зависимости от типа волны (квадратной и/или экспоненциальной), при-ложенного напряжения (50-1500 В) и интервала между импульсами (секунды или минуты). Способ электропорации сделал возможным чрескожную доставку лекарств при воспалительных заболевани-ях [49]; обезболивании [50], химиотерапии опухо-лей [51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Кроме того, электропорация расширяет возможности генной терапии, позволяющий введе-ние ДНК, генов в клетки [58,59], а также для вак-цин [60][61][62].…”
Section: электропорацияunclassified