1973
DOI: 10.2307/3428126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) in Aquatic Organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toxicity testing with salmonid fish and guppies has been carried out (Miller et al, 1973;Norris and Miller, 1974;Hawkes and Norris, 1977) but there are no reports concerning effects on early life stages. De Hullu and Poels (1976) observed a high toxicity for trout fry exposed to water of the river Rhine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicity testing with salmonid fish and guppies has been carried out (Miller et al, 1973;Norris and Miller, 1974;Hawkes and Norris, 1977) but there are no reports concerning effects on early life stages. De Hullu and Poels (1976) observed a high toxicity for trout fry exposed to water of the river Rhine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the results from a single test species are not sufficient to support broad conclusions regarding ecological communities, the lack of toxicity observed in this study is consistent with a larger body of evidence indicating that 2,3,7,8‐TCDD is not toxic to aquatic macroinvertebrates. Investigators have exposed benthic and epibenthic organisms to 2,3,7,8‐TCDD via food (3 μg/g TOC [9]), water (1 μg/L [4] and 0.2 μg/L [7]), flooded spiked soil (7.5 mg/kg [5] and 0.1 mg/kg [6]), and sediment (0.66 μg/kg [8]) and have shown no effects on cladocerans [4–6], midges [9], mosquito larvae [7], sand‐worms [8], oligochaete worms [7,9], snails [5–7], clams [8], and grass shrimp [8]. The lack of dioxin sensitivity in aquatic invertebrates may be explained by the apparent lack of the cytoplasmic aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor that is considered to be a requirement for the manifestation of 2,3,7,8‐TCDD‐related effects (see Poland and Glover [19]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although amphipods had not been tested for 2,3,7,8‐TCDD toxicity prior to this report, several studies have demonstrated that 2,3,7,8‐TCDD, and PCDD/Fs in general, are essentially nontoxic to various aquatic macroinvertebrates [4–9]. For example, Rubinstein et al [8] reported no effects in sandworms, grass shrimp, or clams after exposure to sediment containing an average of 0.66 μg/kg 2,3,7,8‐TCDD, and West et al [9] reported no effects in full life‐cycle tests with midges and oligochaetes at tissue residue concentrations up to 9,533 μg 2,3,7,8‐TCDD/kg lipid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although direct comparison of these results with other studies is complicated somewhat by differences in expression of dose (i.e., water concentrations vs tissue residue), our observations are in agreement with those made in past investigations. For example, Miller et al [23] exposed an annelid ( Paranais sp. ), a snail ( Physa sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%