2018
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity management after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: one size does not fit 'ALL'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the potential severity of both of these complications, there have been significant efforts made in recent years in defining these toxicities and testing potential prevention or treatment modalities, including the formation of toxicity working groups 156 to define cross-institution standards for diagnostic criteria and treatment algorithms. Although significant advances have been made, universal consensus has not been reached, 157 and remains a critical unmet need in the field, especially in the setting of FDA approval, as these therapies move from specialized centers to more broad implementation.…”
Section: Preinfusion Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potential severity of both of these complications, there have been significant efforts made in recent years in defining these toxicities and testing potential prevention or treatment modalities, including the formation of toxicity working groups 156 to define cross-institution standards for diagnostic criteria and treatment algorithms. Although significant advances have been made, universal consensus has not been reached, 157 and remains a critical unmet need in the field, especially in the setting of FDA approval, as these therapies move from specialized centers to more broad implementation.…”
Section: Preinfusion Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also predicts clinical response but does not explain why patients with low grade CRS still have robust and durable responses to CAR‐T cell therapy . Treatment for CRS largely depends on CRS grades, and management of toxicities also varies between adult and pediatric populations . Most patients with grade 1 CRS (fevers, nausea, and myalgia) are managed with supportive care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the persistence of fevers or change in clinical status and hypotension, most physicians will begin treatment with tocilizumab, an IL‐6 receptor inhibitor . If no responses are seen to IL‐6 inhibition, corticosteroids are often used and rapidly reverse severe CRS without compromising initial antitumor response …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tocilizumab does not seem to affect the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in terms of overall response rates, CR rates, or the durability of responses [39, 45, 46]. Siltuximab on the other hand has not been studied as first-line therapy for CRS and is not currently FDA-approved for this indication [42]. Comparative studies are needed to directly compare the effectiveness of tocilizumab and siltuximab in the treatment of CRS.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient hospitalization with close monitoring is recommended by Neelapu et al [39] for at least 7–10 days after CAR T-cell infusion. Others have not found this to be necessary in studies using CAR T-cell constructs containing a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, including tisagenlecleucel, in both ALL and NHL populations [42]. …”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%