2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity, inflammation, and anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activity following exposure to chemical moieties of C31G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard RVI test protocol includes only one assessment of toxicity at 24 h after the final product application and does not provide for measures of toxicity at more acute post-exposure intervals, particularly the first hours after topical application when sexual intercourse and HIV-1 transmission are likely to occur. Our previous studies using the mouse model of cervicovaginal toxicity demonstrated that N-9- and C31G-mediated damage was greatest at 2 to 4 h post-exposure and was minimal or undetectable by 24 h post-application [19,24,25], presumably because epithelial repair mechanisms had restored the epithelium to its pre-exposure state. The standard RVI model would not reveal these important milestones in the time course of N-9 topical toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard RVI test protocol includes only one assessment of toxicity at 24 h after the final product application and does not provide for measures of toxicity at more acute post-exposure intervals, particularly the first hours after topical application when sexual intercourse and HIV-1 transmission are likely to occur. Our previous studies using the mouse model of cervicovaginal toxicity demonstrated that N-9- and C31G-mediated damage was greatest at 2 to 4 h post-exposure and was minimal or undetectable by 24 h post-application [19,24,25], presumably because epithelial repair mechanisms had restored the epithelium to its pre-exposure state. The standard RVI model would not reveal these important milestones in the time course of N-9 topical toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of this model system was demonstrated in investigations that reiterated the clinical toxicity of N-9 (after a single application) and paralleled indications of irritation associated with topical application of 1.7% C31G [19,23,24]. Furthermore, mouse model experiments involving topical vaginal application of N-9 clearly demonstrated that (i) N-9-associated tissue damage was greatest approximately two to four hours post-application, (ii) epithelial damage was limited to the cervix, and (iii) repair and regeneration of cervical epithelial tissues was essentially complete 24 h after a single application of N-9 [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose pSS as our model compound for this study because of its known antiviral activity and its ease of synthesis (Neurath et al, 2006). Current formulations of pSS expose vaginal tissue to the polymeric drug immediately upon application and may increase susceptibility for inflammation, potentially increasing a woman’s chance of contracting HIV (Catalone et al, 2005; Lard-Whiteford, 2004; Ratterree et al, 2005; Warrier et al, 2004). It is therefore vital to investigate delivery vehicles that offer the ability to reduce tissue exposure to drug while dispensing an efficacious dose at the time of viral attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were then exposed to the indicated concentrations of LC, CS, or DS for 1 h. Following the exposure period, cells were washed and assessed for viability using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay [67,68] of viability at the indicated times after washout of the antiviral compounds. In assays involving PBMCs, cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10 5 cells/well in a 96-well plate and subsequently exposed to LC, CS, or DS for 1 h. Following the exposure period, cells were washed and assessed for viability using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay [69,70] of viability at the indicated times after washout. In both assays, viability following compound exposure was determined relative to mock-exposed cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%