2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00155-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity in animals. Trends in evolution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
97
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…[78][79][80] However, the notion that evolutionary interactions between snakes and their prey may be responsible for variation in venom composition has been questioned. 81,82 Concluding Remarks. Intraspecific geographical venom variations represents a well-known phenomenon since more than 70 years ago, 83,84 and numerous authors have described difference in symptomatology after envenomation by snakes from the same species from different geographical origin.…”
Section: Research Articlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[78][79][80] However, the notion that evolutionary interactions between snakes and their prey may be responsible for variation in venom composition has been questioned. 81,82 Concluding Remarks. Intraspecific geographical venom variations represents a well-known phenomenon since more than 70 years ago, 83,84 and numerous authors have described difference in symptomatology after envenomation by snakes from the same species from different geographical origin.…”
Section: Research Articlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This latter strategy can be achieved by feeding on chemically protected prey or by entering into a symbiotic association with toxic micro-organisms (Mebs 2001). Sequestered compounds are taken from an exogenous source and used by the sequestering organisms as precursors of, among others, toxins, deterrents and pheromones (Duffey 1980;Eisner & Meinwald 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, an organism that actively accumulates toxic metabolites from another not only has to develop various adaptations to detoxify, accumulate and use xenobiotics (Duffey 1980), but also has to rely, at least temporarily, on a diet allowing it to reach a sufficient level of toxicity or to accommodate toxin-producing symbionts. Although the source of toxins is usually actively searched for by the sequester, cases of purely passive or opportunistic toxicity acquisitions have been reported: for example, contamination of fishes by toxin-producing micro-organisms (Mebs 2001) or sequestration of man-made pesticides (Eisner et al 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some defensive compounds in animals are synthesized by the defended taxa or their symbionts, but others are sequestered from environmental sources, such as diet [11,12]. In the latter cases, feeding ecology may be important because diet can determine the level of chemical defence [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%