2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-9428-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity Assessment of Treated Wastewater Using Cultured Human Cell Lines

Abstract: Bioassay using cultured human cell lines was applied to an effluent of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Sapporo to assess their toxicity, and in order to investigate the fate of toxicity in the WWTP, bioassay of the water samples from several points in WWTP (influent, effluent, return flow from thickener, from dewatering process and from incineration process) was performed. We also applied bioassay to the mixture of the activated sludge from the investigated plant and artificial sewage. These results sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] and [16] performed the basal cyto-toxicity test using cultured human cell lines, NB-1 15 assay, to samples of water obtained from wastewater and sludge treatment plants. The tests revealed that the toxicity of the effluent was more intensive than the influent and return flows from sludge treatment facilities and the organic matter released from activated sludge bacteria during their decay process 20 contributed to the increase in toxicity in the secondary effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] and [16] performed the basal cyto-toxicity test using cultured human cell lines, NB-1 15 assay, to samples of water obtained from wastewater and sludge treatment plants. The tests revealed that the toxicity of the effluent was more intensive than the influent and return flows from sludge treatment facilities and the organic matter released from activated sludge bacteria during their decay process 20 contributed to the increase in toxicity in the secondary effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narita ve arkadaşları, insan hücresi kültürünü kullanarak atıksu arıtma tesisi giriş, çıkış, çöktürme tankı geri dönüş akımı, susuzlaştırma prosesi geri akımı, atık yakma tesisi geri akımı olmak üzere 5 farklı su örneğinde toksisiteyi gözlemişlerdir. Buna göre, çıkış suyunda toksisitenin daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur [20]. Yi ve arkadaşları tarafından yapılan çalışmada, atıksu arıtma tesisi çıkışı ve alıcı ortamdaki toksisitenin giriş atıksuyundan yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur [21].…”
Section: Tartişma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…Farklı izleme metotları Daphnia magna, Vibrio fisheri biyolüminesans inhibisyon testi, biyosensörler literatürde mevcuttur [20,21,22,23,24]. Ayrıca, Su Kirliliği Kontrol Yönetmeliği'nde yer alan atıksu deşarj parametreleri ile ZSF arasında istatistiksel bir değerlendirme daha önce yapılmadığından, bu çalışma bir örnek yaklaşım niteliği taşımaktadır.…”
Section: Tartişma Ve Sonuçunclassified
“…또한, EfOM은 수계 내 유 해물질인 유기화합물과 중금속의 거동에 영향을 미침으로서 궁극적으로 수서생물에 대한 이들의 독성을 변화시킬 수 있다 (Ruhle et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2012). 따라서 EfOM의 구성성분을 확인하고 물리화학적 특성을 분석하는 연구는 이들이 수계에 미치는 영향을 평가하는데 매우 중요하다 (Quaranta et al, 2012;Shon et al, 2006). 유기물의 흡광 및 형광 특성은 자연유기물질(Natural organic matter, NOM)의 물리화학적 특성을 파악할 수 있는 좋은 지표 로 이용되었다 (Baker and Spencer, 2004;Senesi et al, 1991;Yamashita and Tanoue, 2003).…”
Section: Introduction 1)unclassified