Toxicity and resistance of the cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans (Distant) to neonicotinoid insecticides in Punjab, Pakistan

Saeed, Rabia; Razaq, Muhammad; Abbas, Naeem; Jan, Muhammad Tahir; Naveed, Muhammad

doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.032

Cited by 28 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…THIA was highly toxic to house flies than IMI, and this agrees with Saeed et al (2017) who stated that THIA was more effective to the susceptible population of cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans (Distant) than IMI. Although this result disagree with Chen et al (2015) who showed that IMI exhibited high toxicity to both RF75 and SS strains of Aphis gossypii than THIA.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Comparative Modelling, Toxicological and Biochemical Studies of Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam Insecticides on the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Abdel-Haleem

Genidy

Fahmy

et al. 2018

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. A, Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neonicotinoid baits are recently replacing anticholinesterase baits for adult house fly (Musca domestica L.) control. Recently, imidacloprid (IMI) and thiamethoxam (THIA) are widely used for the control of this pest. In this study both compounds were docked to elucidate their interactions with acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP). The feeding technique was used to evaluate the toxicity of tested insecticides to adult house flies. Bioassay experiments showed that the THIA was more toxic to adult house flies than IMI with LC 50 values 7.27 and 21.08 ppm; respectively. The biochemical activities of acetylcholinesterase, ATPase, cytochrome P-450 and carboxylesterase were increased by insecticides treatment, while, the total protein content was reduced.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Comparative Modelling, Toxicological and Biochemical Studies of Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam Insecticides on the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Abdel-Haleem

Genidy

Fahmy

et al. 2018

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. A, Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Farmers in cotton‐growing areas of Pakistan usually protect crops with indiscriminate dosing of insecticides, resulting in strong selection pressure due to the lack of a well‐defined management strategy for insect pests that causes resistance in insect pests 16,17 . Various insect pests of cotton, such as Earias vittella (Fabricius), 18,19 Spodoptera litura (Fabricius), 20–22 Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), 23 Amrasca devastans (Distant), 24 Dysdercus koenigi (Fabricius) 25 and Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), 26 have become resistant due to extensive use of insecticides. Excessive insecticide applications also cause serious ecological and environmental pollution 27 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inheritance mode and metabolic mechanism of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor resistance in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa)

Wazir

Shad

2021

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Dusky cotton bug (DCB), Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), is a key insect pest of cotton. It causes huge losses to cotton and many other economically important crops. Sulfoxaflor is a newly introduced systemic insecticide that is effective against many sap‐feeding insect pests such as aphids, whiteflies and true bugs. The present study was designed to characterize the inheritance of sulfoxaflor resistance in DCB. Moreover, the role of synergists in reducing sulfoxaflor resistance in DCB was also assessed. RESULTS A field population of DCB has developed 1132.0‐fold resistance to sulfoxaflor after 11 selected generations in the laboratory. Nonsignificant difference of reciprocal crosses was observed depending on the LC50 (median lethal concentration) values (95% confidence intervals overlapped), suggesting an autosomal mode of sulfoxaflor resistance inheritance. The degree of dominance of 0.7 for F1 (Sulfo‐Sel Pop ♀ × Lab‐Pop♂) and 0.6 for F1'(Sulfo‐Sel Pop ♂ × Lab‐Pop♀), respectively, suggested that sulfoxaflor resistance was incompletely dominant. According to the monogenic model, the number of genes involved to induce sulfoxaflor resistance revealed that sulfoxaflor resistance was polygenic in nature. The realized heritability (h2) value for sulfoxaflor resistance was 0.2. The synergists experiment indicated that esterases were involved in the sulfoxaflor resistance mechanism in DCB. CONCLUSIONS The current results indicate that there is autosomal, incompletely dominant and polygenic inheritance of sulfoxaflor resistance in DCB. Our results would be helpful in delaying sulfoxaflor resistance against DCB in the field. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

“…ha -1 (50.8%) as compared to other treatments. Similarly, in recent years, sulfoxaflor, flonicamid, chlorfenapyr, spirotetramat, fipronil, and nitenpyram insecticides are being used for the control of various sucking insect pests including A. devastans (Saeed et al, 2017).…”

Section: Efficacy Of Sulfoxaflor and Other Insecticides Against Jassidsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bio-efficacy of Sulfoxaflor and Other Insecticides Against Sucking Pests of Cotton

Prasad¹

2022

IJBSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field trials were conducted for two consecutive years during kharif, 2015 and 2016 seasons at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Warangal, Telangana, India to study the bio efficacy of sulfoxaflor and other broad-spectrum insecticides on sucking pests and natural enemies of cotton under rain fed black soils. Among the treatments, a significant (47.6%) reduction of aphids was recorded with sulfoxaflor at 100 g a.i. ha-1 followed by flonicamid at 75 g a.i. ha-1 (42.8%) and sulfoxaflor at 90 (42.8%) as compared to other treatments. The highest reduction (61.0 %) of jassid was observed in flonicamid at 75 g a.i. ha-1 followed sulfoxaflor at 90 (50.8%) as compared to other treatments. The highest reduction (30.2%) of thrips was observed in sulfoxaflor at 100 g a.i. ha-1 followed by flonicamid at 75 g a.i. ha-1 (19.8%) and sulfoxaflor at 90 (19.8%) respectively, as compared to other treatments. The highest reduction (41.9%) of whitefly was observed in buprofezin at 250 g a.i. ha-1 followed by dinotefuran at 150 g a.i. ha-1 (35.5%) as compared to other treatments. None of the insecticidal treatments has affected the abundance of the natural enemy population during both the years of study. Overall, the study further revealed that, Sulfoxaflor at 100 g a.i ha-1 and flonicamid at 75 g a.i. ha-1 have shown good efficacy against sucking pests as well as recorded the highest seed cotton yield compared to other treatments and can be used as an alternative to other insecticides in the control of Cotton sucking pests.

show abstract

Toxicity and resistance of the cotton leaf hopper, Amrasca devastans (Distant) to neonicotinoid insecticides in Punjab, Pakistan

Cited by 28 publications

References 42 publications

Comparative Modelling, Toxicological and Biochemical Studies of Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam Insecticides on the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Comparative Modelling, Toxicological and Biochemical Studies of Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam Insecticides on the House Fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Inheritance mode and metabolic mechanism of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor resistance in Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa)

Bio-efficacy of Sulfoxaflor and Other Insecticides Against Sucking Pests of Cotton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About