It is generally accepted that Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins insert into the apical membrane of the larval midgut after binding to specific receptors, and there is evidence that the distribution of binding molecules along the midgut is not uniform. By use of the voltage-sensitive dye DiSC 3 (5) and 125 I-labeled Cry1Ac, we have measured the effect of Cry1Ac in terms of permeabilization capacity and of binding parameters on brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) prepared from the anterior and the posterior regions of the larval midgut from two insect species, Manduca sexta and Helicoverpa armigera. The permeabilizing activity was significantly higher with BBMV from the posterior region than with the one observed in the anterior region in both insect species. Instead, 125 I-Cry1Ac bound specifically to BBMV from the two midgut regions, with no significant differences in the binding parameters between the anterior and posterior regions within an insect species. N-acetylgalactosamine inhibition patterns on pore formation and binding differed between anterior and posterior midgut regions and between species, providing evidence of a multifaceted involvement of the sugar in the Cry1Ac mode of action. The analysis of binding and pore formation in different midgut regions could be an effective method to study differences in the mode of action of Cry1Ac toxin in different species.The insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins produced in parasporal crystals during sporulation (Cry proteins or Cry toxins) has been widely studied in lepidopteran insects, and there is relatively good evidence for the way the proteins act once ingested by a susceptible insect. There is general agreement in that the parasporal crystal dissolves after ingestion, and then the released protoxin is processed by gut proteases to an activated form; the active toxin crosses the peritrophic membrane and binds to specific receptors in the brush border membrane of midgut columnar cells and eventually leads to cell death (6,13,41,43).The events that take place after binding are not yet clear, although the permeabilization of the membrane induced by toxin insertion and pore formation has long been proposed (34) and there is much evidence which supports this view (6,13,41,43). In a model for the mode of action of Cry1A toxins, cadherin and aminopeptidase N (APN) receptors have a pivotal role (7): Cry1A toxins are proposed to bind to cadherin first, and then, after proteolytical modification of the bound toxin, a homo-oligomer is formed, which is transferred to APN and then inserts into the membrane. In support of this model, a recent study has shown that Cry1A-modified toxins, which spontaneously form the oligomer, can bypass the step of binding to cadherin to produce the toxic effect (46). Membranebound alkaline phosphatase also seems to play a role in the mode of action of Cry1A toxins, and it has been shown to be a Cry1Ac binding molecule in Manduca sexta (39,42) and Heliothis virescens (14,30). A recent model has challenged the pore-for...