2016
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e14534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicities in immunotherapy: Can they predict response?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several prior studies have suggested an association between the development of irAEs and clinical response in melanoma patients treated with checkpoint blockade, most were with the cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) inhibitor ipilimumab. For example, a recent study showed that melanoma patients who developed grade 3 toxicities requiring steroid treatment while being treated with ipilimumab had higher response rates and a longer median duration of response . Two other studies in melanoma patients treated with PD‐1 inhibitors have had similar results demonstrating that cutaneous irAEs were associated with a better treatment response .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While several prior studies have suggested an association between the development of irAEs and clinical response in melanoma patients treated with checkpoint blockade, most were with the cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) inhibitor ipilimumab. For example, a recent study showed that melanoma patients who developed grade 3 toxicities requiring steroid treatment while being treated with ipilimumab had higher response rates and a longer median duration of response . Two other studies in melanoma patients treated with PD‐1 inhibitors have had similar results demonstrating that cutaneous irAEs were associated with a better treatment response .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, a recent study has suggested a correlation between grade 3 or 4 immunotherapy related adverse events (irAEs) and the degree of durable response. Patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab who experienced grade 3 toxicities requiring steroids were found to have higher response rates to therapy and a longer median duration of response [ 13 ]. It was postulated by the investigators that these toxicities may reflect increased immunotherapy activity in melanoma, and thus as a result explaining the improved patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, molecular characterization may guide us. In malignant melanoma patients, treated with Ipilimumab, development of grade-3 toxicities has been shown to correlate with higher response rates and a longer median duration of response [3]. Our patient experienced significant toxicity with immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…When the ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 bind to the PD-1 receptor, it leads to inhibition of the cellular immune response [2]. Tumour cells can exploit this pathway by upregulating PD-L1 to escape immune surveillance [3]. Studies have shown that increased PD-L1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%