2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic serum levels of tacrolimus after topical administration in an infant with severe cutaneous graft-versus-host disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,[26][27][28] Although the extent of TAC absorption through oral mucosa remains unclear, there is evidence for increased absorption through diseased skin. 14,[26][27][28][29][30] The mechanism behind higher absorption may be explained by impairment of the mucosal barrier in severe oral cGVHD cases. Two cases associated with intraoral topical TAC use have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,[26][27][28] Although the extent of TAC absorption through oral mucosa remains unclear, there is evidence for increased absorption through diseased skin. 14,[26][27][28][29][30] The mechanism behind higher absorption may be explained by impairment of the mucosal barrier in severe oral cGVHD cases. Two cases associated with intraoral topical TAC use have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature reports its possible efficacy in an ointment formulation for GvHD of the oral mucosa [5][6][7]. However, possible systemic absorption necessitating the consequent therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma levels should be kept in mind [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 31-day period, 525 interventions were collected (16.9 AE 3.7 per day), targeting 29 patients. The main drug-related problems were adverse drug reactions (N ¼ 125, 23.8%), untreated indication (N ¼ 92, 17.5%) and failure to receive drug (N ¼ 89, 17.0%). The pharmacist's interventions concerned mainly dose adjustment (N ¼ 174, 33.1%) and drug monitoring (N ¼ 132, 25.1%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%