2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic effects of thiol-reactive compounds on anaerobic biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding to solvent, a decrease of COD removal efficiency occurred only when the biomass was saturated, more than 200 h after the shock load began. Anaerobic biomass can acclimate to toxic compounds and recover from inhibition as long as the toxicant concentration is below a threshold level (Tepe et al, 2006). Therefore, strategies that make the contaminants concentration entering in the reactor lower, for example increasing the dilution rate, should be implemented after toxic state recognition to overcome/minimize the possible problematic contamination of the process.…”
Section: Differentiate the Shock Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding to solvent, a decrease of COD removal efficiency occurred only when the biomass was saturated, more than 200 h after the shock load began. Anaerobic biomass can acclimate to toxic compounds and recover from inhibition as long as the toxicant concentration is below a threshold level (Tepe et al, 2006). Therefore, strategies that make the contaminants concentration entering in the reactor lower, for example increasing the dilution rate, should be implemented after toxic state recognition to overcome/minimize the possible problematic contamination of the process.…”
Section: Differentiate the Shock Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these reactions, oxo-bridged Fe(III) dimer was reduced to Fe(II) and the thiols were oxidized as follows; glutathione was oxidized to disulphide [39], methionine to sulphoxide [40], while Lcysteine and mercaptoacetic acid [37,38] were oxidized to sulphonic acid respectively. These observed behaviours were rationalized on the basis that though oxidation of thiols is dependent on the nature of oxidant [34,35], thiol oxidation can also occur through N, O, or S atom. For Lcysteine and mercaptoacetic acid reaction systems, electron transfer occurred more readily via S atom since S is more nucleophilic than N or O atoms [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other bridged complexes of iron like phthalocyanines and porphyrazines have been synthesized [32] but their redox reactions not fully reported. The structures of μ-oxo diiron (III) porphyrazine complex and the schematic representation of two μ-oxo diiron complexes with unsubstituted phthalocyanine ligands and their principal properties [32] are shown in Figures 3 and 4 Stronger oxidants oxidize thiols to sulphonic acid but they are oxidized to disulphide by the weaker oxidants [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%