2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic effects of microplastics in plants depend more by their surface functional groups than just accumulation contents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Under the action of root pressure, nano-PS, nano-PS-COOH, and their complexes with Cr(VI) will enter the apoplastic space of roots through some narrow gaps in the roots of Z. mays. 24 These contaminants pass through the outer cell cortex into the middle column and then transport and accumulate to the parts of Z. mays under the transpiration tension. Nano-PS-COOH is negatively charged, so its biological response is weak, 25,26 which will not cause significant oxidative damage to Z. mays.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Under the action of root pressure, nano-PS, nano-PS-COOH, and their complexes with Cr(VI) will enter the apoplastic space of roots through some narrow gaps in the roots of Z. mays. 24 These contaminants pass through the outer cell cortex into the middle column and then transport and accumulate to the parts of Z. mays under the transpiration tension. Nano-PS-COOH is negatively charged, so its biological response is weak, 25,26 which will not cause significant oxidative damage to Z. mays.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PS‐COOH NPs that entered the xylem more abundantly produced weaker toxic effects in Arabidopsis than PS‐NH 2 ‐F NPs (positive charge) due to the fact that the PS‐NH 2 ‐F NPs significantly affected the expression of genes related to free radical scavenging (Sun et al, 2020). A previous report also reported that the phytotoxicity of MPs depends more on their surface charge group than on the number of MPs absorbed by the plant (Xu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Influencing Factors Of Np Phytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nanoplastics can also indirectly affect plant growth by influencing metabolic and gene expression (Figure 4). Compared with other surface‐modified NPs, NP‐NH 2 significantly reduced mineral elements in roots, organic matter secreted by roots, and organic matter content in roots by affecting metabolic pathways (Xu et al, 2022). Furthermore, Li, Luo, et al (2020) found that PS NPs significantly reduced antioxidant enzyme activity in rice roots due to the down‐regulation of the relative expression of CAT genes.…”
Section: Effects Of Nps On Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations