2010
DOI: 10.1080/13619461003768272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Town Twinning in Cold-War Britain: (Dis)continuities in Twentieth-Century Municipal Internationalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the cold war an ideological dimension was added to the motives to form partnerships; TT could help to promote understanding for different ideological systems. The latter initiatives often met with distrust from more central governments (Clarke 2010), and it is questionable whether these ideological forms of TT reduced transaction costs in a way that could stimulate population growth. Figure 1 illustrates TT in European countries.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the cold war an ideological dimension was added to the motives to form partnerships; TT could help to promote understanding for different ideological systems. The latter initiatives often met with distrust from more central governments (Clarke 2010), and it is questionable whether these ideological forms of TT reduced transaction costs in a way that could stimulate population growth. Figure 1 illustrates TT in European countries.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, for example, in the case of urban policy [considered more directly in the paper by McCann and Ward (2012)] explicitly place-based policies and priorities are consistently formulated with reference to particular understandings of the global context, and it is hard to ignore the heavily populated world of consultants, exchanges and visits, political and professional networks that cluster around urban initiatives and which often have a longer history than is sometimes acknowledged (see, eg, K Ward, 2006;Clarke, 2010;. Meanwhile urban competitiveness in a global marketplace has become a shared concern of academic and policy literatures (see, eg, Buck et al, 2005) as debates have oscillated between emphasizing the need for successful cities to open themselves up to the market to bemoaning the ideological hegemony of neoliberalism as a political force or, more positively, searching for the spaces to develop alternative visions at the urban level (Brenner et al, 2010;Cochrane, 2007;Leitner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Thinking About the Geographies Of Policy Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The favoured approach was the CEM bonding model and reasons for this can be found in correspondence and other documents held in the National Archives at Kew, London. Again, these documents are analysed in detail elsewhere (Clarke 2010b supplemented -and, to a certain extent, replaced -the position that local welfare could best be secured by providing local welfare services, with the position that it could best be secured by attracting mobile investment capital (Cochrane 1993, Hall and Hubbard 1998, Harvey 1989). This 'new urban politics' provided one frame for Some have used the term 'town twinning' to describe just those partnerships forged in Western Europe after the Second World War, and have used other terms to describe later arrangements: 'North-South linking', 'decentralised cooperation', 'city-to-city cooperation' etc.…”
Section: Conceptualising Town Twinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere, I have used it to further understandings of urban policy mobility (Clarke 2010a) and municipal internationalism (Clarke 2010b). In the rest of this paper, I want to use town twinning research to engage with feminist moral philosophy and one of its applications: geographies of care.…”
Section: The Problem Of Care-at-a-distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation