Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3394171.3413825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Unsupervised Crowd Counting via Regression-Detection Bi-knowledge Transfer

Abstract: Unsupervised crowd counting is a challenging yet not largely explored task. In this paper, we explore it in a transfer learning setting where we learn to detect and count persons in an unlabeled target set by transferring bi-knowledge learnt from regression-and detection-based models in a labeled source set. The dual source knowledge of the two models is heterogeneous and complementary as they capture different modalities of the crowd distribution. We formulate the mutual transformations between the outputs of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [30], multiple domain specific modules are trained using labeled data from target domains for online switching. [27] proposes to take advantage of both detection and regression-based counting frameworks, and fine-tunes the offline learned counter via online-estimated pseudo labels.…”
Section: Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [30], multiple domain specific modules are trained using labeled data from target domains for online switching. [27] proposes to take advantage of both detection and regression-based counting frameworks, and fine-tunes the offline learned counter via online-estimated pseudo labels.…”
Section: Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source domain training on ShanghaiTech. Following the experiment design of other domain adaptation methods [10,27], we first evaluate cross-domain counting using SHA or SHB as the source domain, and SHB/SHA and UCF-QNRF as the target domains. We compare our proposed C 2 MoT with two main types of counting methods: 1) fine-tuning based domain adaptation methods, including Cycle GAN [51], SE CycleGAN [45], SE+FD [10] and RBT [27];…”
Section: Zero-shot Cross-domain Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hossain et al [21] reduce the domain shift by minimizing the feature distances (i.e., Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) [44]) across domains. (iii) others [41], [77]: [41] introduce an extra head detector for mutual training with the crowd counter. [77] present a neuron linear transformation to optimize a small amount of parameters based on few targetdomain training samples.…”
Section: Domain Adaptation For Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[77] present a neuron linear transformation to optimize a small amount of parameters based on few targetdomain training samples. Methods in others can be regarded as supplements of pixel-level and feature-level methods with additional bounding box annotations [41] or extra targetdomain annotations [77].…”
Section: Domain Adaptation For Crowd Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…source domain, and perform counting on more open-set scenarios, i.e. target domain, [12,13] by transfer learning and domain adaptation techniques. Liu et al [13] enable knowledge distillation between both regression-based and detectionbased models by formulating the mutual transformation of outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%