2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1810.09587
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Universal Dialogue State Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments here are not intend to get the best performance but to prove our POGD model can handle unseen values, so we only train 20 epochs to get results in Table 3. It is important to emphasize that our POGD can generalize to unseen values without using SLU module or delexicalization like previous works (Rastogi et al, 2017;Ren et al, 2018)…”
Section: Unseen Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments here are not intend to get the best performance but to prove our POGD model can handle unseen values, so we only train 20 epochs to get results in Table 3. It is important to emphasize that our POGD can generalize to unseen values without using SLU module or delexicalization like previous works (Rastogi et al, 2017;Ren et al, 2018)…”
Section: Unseen Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rastogi et al (2017) generated a fix set of candidate values using a separate SLU module, so suffered from error accumulation. StateNet (Ren et al, 2018) reduced the dependence of ontology but no verification was done in their work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such approaches perform very well on datasets which are defined over fairly small ontologies. Apply these methods to more complex datasets however reveals various limitations (Ren et al, 2018;Nouri and Hosseini-Asl, 2018). First, it is often difficult to obtain a complete ontology for a task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%