2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face &Amp; Gesture Recognition (FG 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/fg.2018.00093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Understanding Emotional Reactions of Driver-Passenger Dyads in Automated Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A post-hoc review of positive and negative emotion induction in higher fidelity automated (2) and manual (1) driving experiments indicate greater robustness for negative emotion inductions: greater number of inductions [37], range of induction [38] and inter-rater reliability [39]. A broad literature review indicates that scenario based methods for emotional induction are more robust in negative than positive cases [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A post-hoc review of positive and negative emotion induction in higher fidelity automated (2) and manual (1) driving experiments indicate greater robustness for negative emotion inductions: greater number of inductions [37], range of induction [38] and inter-rater reliability [39]. A broad literature review indicates that scenario based methods for emotional induction are more robust in negative than positive cases [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While advances in group emotion recognition have been made, existing approaches have shortcomings, such as assuming the group to share one common emotion, largely relying on just one modality and not considering the evolution of emotions over time [127]. Group affect in the car is rarely investigated, one such work being a study of Alyuz et al, who examine the emotions of driver-passenger dyads in simulated autonomous driving [131].…”
Section: Group Affect and Priorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%