EXCLI Journal; 17:Doc688; ISSN 1611-2156 2018
DOI: 10.17179/excli2018-1417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards understanding aromatase inhibitory activity via QSAR modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(170 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we aimed to develop a classification model that is able to determine active from inactive compounds, and build a web-app for differentiating compounds for M pro with selectivity. We followed the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommendations to develop robust QSAR models for this purpose [64]. These guidelines comprise of the following major points: (i) the data set should have a defined endpoint, (ii) it should use an explicit learning algorithm, (iii) there should be a defined applicability domain of the built model, (iv) appropriate measurement of robustness and predictivity and (v) interpretation of the important features of the QSAR model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, we aimed to develop a classification model that is able to determine active from inactive compounds, and build a web-app for differentiating compounds for M pro with selectivity. We followed the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommendations to develop robust QSAR models for this purpose [64]. These guidelines comprise of the following major points: (i) the data set should have a defined endpoint, (ii) it should use an explicit learning algorithm, (iii) there should be a defined applicability domain of the built model, (iv) appropriate measurement of robustness and predictivity and (v) interpretation of the important features of the QSAR model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature subset achieving the highest Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was considered as the optimal feature subset. The implementation of these classifiers in the two-step feature selection strategy is the same as used in our previous studies 18 , 31 , 38 41 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to examine the performance of our proposed predictor, we used five common statistical metrics including ACC, MCC, sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) 24 , 42 as described follows: where TP, TN, FP and FN represent the number of true positives, true negatives, false positive and false negatives, respectively. In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was employed as another statistical metric 39 41 , 43 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial least square (PLS) is a very common modeling method when correlated latent variables exist among descriptors (Helland 2001). As a generalization of the traditional multiple linear regression (MLR) algorithm, PLS has the ability to analyze data with strong collinearity, large noise, and multiple variables, and it also improves the overfitting problem of the MLR algorithm to a certain extent (Shoombuatong et al 2018). In addition, it has the ability to model multiple response variables simultaneously (Cao et al 2010a).…”
Section: Partial Least Square (Pls)mentioning
confidence: 99%