Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics &Amp; Knowledge 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2883851.2883964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards triggering higher-order thinking behaviors in MOOCs

Abstract: With the aim of better scaffolding discussion to improve learning in a MOOC context, this work investigates what kinds of discussion behaviors contribute to learning. We explored whether engaging in higher-order thinking behaviors results in more learning than paying general or focused attention to course materials. In order to evaluate whether to attribute the effect to engagement in the associated behaviors versus persistent characteristics of the students, we adopted two approaches. First, we used propensit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted two studies using the AVW platform to learn about giving pitch presentations. The findings can inform further improvements of the AVW platform (similar to [22,25]), and future enhancements with intelligent nudging features to improve learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We conducted two studies using the AVW platform to learn about giving pitch presentations. The findings can inform further improvements of the AVW platform (similar to [22,25]), and future enhancements with intelligent nudging features to improve learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, it is possible that the students were not prepared for higher quality discussions and there was a lack in effective guidance and stimulations of high-order thinking. The latter could potentially be supported via activities such as problems' creations and solutions (Tofade, Elsner, & Haines, 2013), situation-related topic discussions (Wang, Wen, & Rosé, 2016), feedback exchange among teachers and students (Ertmer et al, 2007), or assessment of discussion contributions (Klisc, McGill, & Hobbs, 2017), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the study is limited to the investigation of technologyenhanced scaffolding in the context of the problem solving by management students in a flipped classroom. There is a need to also consider scaffolds related to collaboratively (Leimeister, 2014) presenting and reflecting on the results of problem solving online completely self-regulated learning approaches, e.g., in MOOCs (Seaton, Bergner, Chuang, Mitros, & Pritchard, 2014;Wang, Wen, & Rosé, 2016).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%