2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.07482
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Trainable Saliency Maps in Medical Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important example is the domain of biomedical imaging. Here, medical practitioners are often interested in what the most important regions of a radiographic image are for a specific prediction (Arun et al, 2020a,b;Aggarwal et al, 2020), in order to build trust in the model and identify when a model might be making a mistake. Application of the general guidelines given above can help developers choose the right attribution method in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important example is the domain of biomedical imaging. Here, medical practitioners are often interested in what the most important regions of a radiographic image are for a specific prediction (Arun et al, 2020a,b;Aggarwal et al, 2020), in order to build trust in the model and identify when a model might be making a mistake. Application of the general guidelines given above can help developers choose the right attribution method in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this data collection method is impractical, since the whole process may take too long a period, be expensive, and might get imbalanced distributions among different diseases. Differently, radiologists and computer scientists have recently managed to use saliency methods [44][45][46][47] , to generate heat maps that highlight the regions significantly contributing to the diagnosis, and used the heat-maps as labeling of the CheXpert dataset 48 , a large public available dataset. Saliency methods offer post-hoc interpretability for the pathological regions in the radiographs but are not exposed to pixel-level localization 49 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%