2018
DOI: 10.1134/s2070046618040015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Three-Dimensional Conformal Probability

Abstract: In this outline of a program, based on rigorous renormalization group theory, we introduce new definitions which allow one to formulate precise mathematical conjectures related to conformal invariance as studied by physicists in the area known as higher-dimensional conformal bootstrap which has developed at a breathtaking pace over the last few years. We also explore a second theme, intimately tied to conformal invariance for random distributions, which can be construed as a search for very general first and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9.14) We also need a lower bound on A N for n = 4. By (5.5), (5.10), and Lemmas 5.4-5.5, apart from a bounded number of scales near 0 and near j m , for j ≤ j m we have δ j [w (2) ] ≍ L ǫj . By restricting the sum in (9.10) to avoid those few scales, the desired lower bound on A N follows similarly.…”
Section: Analysis Of Flow Equation For Umentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(9.14) We also need a lower bound on A N for n = 4. By (5.5), (5.10), and Lemmas 5.4-5.5, apart from a bounded number of scales near 0 and near j m , for j ≤ j m we have δ j [w (2) ] ≍ L ǫj . By restricting the sum in (9.10) to avoid those few scales, the desired lower bound on A N follows similarly.…”
Section: Analysis Of Flow Equation For Umentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The result is that B N also obeys the upper bound (9.14), and consequently so does −u ′′ N . For a lower bound on B N for n = 4, as in (9.10), but now taking into account the exponential decay above the mass scale, there is a z > 0 such that 15) where the (nonnegative) δ[w (2) ] term has been discarded in the lower bound. This is of the same order in j m as the upper bound on A N , but it contains an additional factors, so it cannot spoil the lower bound provided by A N .…”
Section: Analysis Of Flow Equation For Umentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For completeness, we end §6 with a proof of conformal invariance for the FMFF example. This was previously sketched in [5] to which we refer the reader for more background. When d = 2 and for some smooth volume cut-off function g(x), our result also shows that…”
Section: 113mentioning
confidence: 99%