AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum 2021
DOI: 10.2514/6.2021-1061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Use of Ontologies in Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Conceptual Design: Opportunities and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the ontology-based method for the breakdown of SoS missions [18], which uses the UAF at the model level before reasoning based on ontology, this study develops ontology at the metamodel level, thus providing more flexibility for the SoS modeling based on AFs. Ontologies can help to avoid ambiguities, facilitate information exchange between modules and external software, and provide a shared understanding of the design process [59]. In contrast to an ontology-based common conceptual reference used as a foundation for aircraft design processes [59], we employ the UAF metamodel to develop an ontology with greater detail on the SoS architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the ontology-based method for the breakdown of SoS missions [18], which uses the UAF at the model level before reasoning based on ontology, this study develops ontology at the metamodel level, thus providing more flexibility for the SoS modeling based on AFs. Ontologies can help to avoid ambiguities, facilitate information exchange between modules and external software, and provide a shared understanding of the design process [59]. In contrast to an ontology-based common conceptual reference used as a foundation for aircraft design processes [59], we employ the UAF metamodel to develop an ontology with greater detail on the SoS architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies can help to avoid ambiguities, facilitate information exchange between modules and external software, and provide a shared understanding of the design process [59]. In contrast to an ontology-based common conceptual reference used as a foundation for aircraft design processes [59], we employ the UAF metamodel to develop an ontology with greater detail on the SoS architecture. This enriched ontology extends the relationships and flows, facilitating the proposal of architecture steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%