The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-62138-7_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Prediction of Compliance Influences on Shape Deviations in Internal Traverse Grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation system presented in this work is an extension of the results presented in [35], where a compliance model which was calibrated based on static analogy tests was proposed. Using a kinematic simulation, final workpiece contours were predicted based on process forces recorded in grinding investigations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation system presented in this work is an extension of the results presented in [35], where a compliance model which was calibrated based on static analogy tests was proposed. Using a kinematic simulation, final workpiece contours were predicted based on process forces recorded in grinding investigations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the models and to evaluate the transferability of the proposed methods between different machines and process strategies, the experimental results from the industrial setting presented in [35] are compared to the results of the new simulation system and additional experimental grinding tests. In addition, static compliance tests were performed in the laboratory setting in analogy to [35]. For the sake of clarity and for the reader's convenience, the contents of the previous work are briefly recapitulated in the following sections whenever the same method was applied to the laboratory machine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations