2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-015-9312-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the generation of dialogue acts in socio-affective ECAs: a corpus-based prosodic analysis

Abstract: International audienceWe present a corpus-based prosodic analysis with the aim of uncovering the relationship between dialogue acts, personality and prosody in view to providing guidelines for the ECA Greta's text-to-speech system. The corpus used is the SEMAINE corpus, featuring four different personalities, further annotated for dialogue acts and prosodic features. In order to show the importance of the choice of dialogue act taxonomy, two different taxonomies were used, the first corresponding to Searle's t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e first constraint is DEP-IO (P), which is violated when the generally unstressed words are accented, especially with contrastive or emphatic information or by misplacement of stress. In such situation, all prominence achieved in the output may be more than that in the input [23]. In the given material, violations of DEP-IO (P) were opposite in sentence 1; hello and she in sentence 2; did in sentence 3; up in sentence 4; why in sentence 5; myself in sentence 6; who and that in sentence 8; and I in sentence 9.…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of Constraint Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…e first constraint is DEP-IO (P), which is violated when the generally unstressed words are accented, especially with contrastive or emphatic information or by misplacement of stress. In such situation, all prominence achieved in the output may be more than that in the input [23]. In the given material, violations of DEP-IO (P) were opposite in sentence 1; hello and she in sentence 2; did in sentence 3; up in sentence 4; why in sentence 5; myself in sentence 6; who and that in sentence 8; and I in sentence 9.…”
Section: Results and Analysis Of Constraint Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 82%