2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the development of theoretically correct liquid activity coefficient models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared to these methods, an even blacker‐box approach that is sometimes encountered in chemistry applications (but more often in the chemical engineering literature) is “COSMO‐RS,” 197,376–380 a model developed by Klamt and coworkers based on COSMO electrostatics (Section 2.4) but designed for “real solvents.” As its basic ingredient, COSMO‐RS uses a coarse‐grained version of the COSMO surface charge density σ ( s ), averaged over segments of the cavity surface to define a “ σ ‐profile.” Solution‐phase activities are then parameterized in terms of the σ ‐profile, and this constitutes a QM‐based alternative to other parameterized activity coefficient models that are widely used in engineering thermodynamics 381–384 . However, modern versions of COSMO‐RS are available only in the proprietary cosmotherm software, 378 and attempts by other groups to implement (or sometimes even to use) COSMO‐RS and related models outside of the cosmotherm program have been met with harsh criticism from Klamt 385–414 . The tenor of those discussions strongly suggests that insufficient details are available in the literature that would allow others to implement COSMO‐RS 306,387,390,393,396,405,408,411,414,415 .…”
Section: Solvation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared to these methods, an even blacker‐box approach that is sometimes encountered in chemistry applications (but more often in the chemical engineering literature) is “COSMO‐RS,” 197,376–380 a model developed by Klamt and coworkers based on COSMO electrostatics (Section 2.4) but designed for “real solvents.” As its basic ingredient, COSMO‐RS uses a coarse‐grained version of the COSMO surface charge density σ ( s ), averaged over segments of the cavity surface to define a “ σ ‐profile.” Solution‐phase activities are then parameterized in terms of the σ ‐profile, and this constitutes a QM‐based alternative to other parameterized activity coefficient models that are widely used in engineering thermodynamics 381–384 . However, modern versions of COSMO‐RS are available only in the proprietary cosmotherm software, 378 and attempts by other groups to implement (or sometimes even to use) COSMO‐RS and related models outside of the cosmotherm program have been met with harsh criticism from Klamt 385–414 . The tenor of those discussions strongly suggests that insufficient details are available in the literature that would allow others to implement COSMO‐RS 306,387,390,393,396,405,408,411,414,415 .…”
Section: Solvation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the same conventions, the total number of pairs (i, j) can also be written as N i N ji , and the pair conservation condition will be N i N ji = N j N ij. According to Lin et al [10] in order to fulfill the pair conservation rule, the coordination number, or the effective contact in our case, must be expressed as:…”
Section: Appendix a The Pair Conservation Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to express this condition, consider the total number of pairs (j, i), as the product N j N ij , where N ij is the number of molecules i surrounding the j molecule, and N j is the number of molecules j in the liquid. Following the same conventions, the total number of pairs (i, j) can also be written as N i N ji , and the pair conservation condition will be N i N ji = N j N ij (see Lin et al [10]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, COSMO-based models like COSMO-RS and COSMO-SAC are the outstanding examples of such models. These models have a sound theoretical basis and have been shown to provide reasonably accurate predictions for a wide varieties of fluid mixtures, including organic fluids, pharmaceuticals, gas molecules, , supercritical fluids, , electrolytes, and ionic liquids (ILs). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%