2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the development of a fully integrated polymeric microfluidic platform for environmental analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow rates for the microdevice were comparable to those for miniaturized commercial pumps, and analysis of nitrite solutions showed sub-ppm limits of detection. 359 An aerosol analyzer with a growth tube collector connected to a PDMS microchip was developed for online monitoring of aerosol composition (Figure 35). Air was pulled downward through the growth tube where the particles were enlarged and deposited into the microchip sample reservoir for μCE.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow rates for the microdevice were comparable to those for miniaturized commercial pumps, and analysis of nitrite solutions showed sub-ppm limits of detection. 359 An aerosol analyzer with a growth tube collector connected to a PDMS microchip was developed for online monitoring of aerosol composition (Figure 35). Air was pulled downward through the growth tube where the particles were enlarged and deposited into the microchip sample reservoir for μCE.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work on developing environmental methods for field applications has involved sensors or microfluidic devices for single analytes, or new miniature in situ water samplers, where the sample is recovered and analysed using conventional laboratory instrumentation (Bowden et al, 2002b;Datta and Banerjee, 2007;Gkritzalis-Papdopoulos et al, 2012;Jokerst et al, 2012). For field use, a lab-on-a-chip device of this nature offers huge potential advantages over existing in situ continuous monitoring technologies, because of robustness, reduced power and reagent requirements, reduced waste burden, and the capability to be hidden discretely to minimise interference by vandals (Ramirez-Garcia et al, 2008;Jokerst et al, 2012). The nature of these labon-a-chip devices would also mean that multiple locations throughout a catchment could be monitored easily within the framework of an integrated sensor network.…”
Section: The Practicalities and Challenges Of In Situ Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many groups involved in the production of microfluidics devices for FDS investigated microfabrication techniques 16,17 or developed support structures, such as pumps [18][19][20][21] and valves. 22 These papers show the importance of adjustments.…”
Section: Modifications Demanded For the Use Of Microfluidic Devices Imentioning
confidence: 99%