2020
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2020-16
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the connection between snow microphysics and melting layer: Insights from multi-frequency and dual-polarization radar observations during BAECC

Abstract: Abstract. In stratiform rainfall, the melting layer is often visible in radar observations as an enhanced reflectivity band, the so-called bright band. Despite the ongoing debate on the exact microphysical processes taking place in the melting layer and on how they translate into radar measurements, both model simulations and observations indicate that the radar-measured melting layer properties are influenced by snow microphysical processes that take place above it. There is still, however, a lack of comprehe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C‐band LDR observations show a slightly descending trend as can be identified between 21:50 and 22:35 UTC. The local sagging of C‐band LDR in the ML (Kumjian et al., 2016) coincides with two fall streaks at around 22:25 UTC and 22:35 UTC, which can be explained by the locally enhanced aggregation and precipitation rate (Carlin & Ryzhkov, 2019; Li et al., 2020). In contrast, W‐band LDR shows less variation in the ML at these times.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C‐band LDR observations show a slightly descending trend as can be identified between 21:50 and 22:35 UTC. The local sagging of C‐band LDR in the ML (Kumjian et al., 2016) coincides with two fall streaks at around 22:25 UTC and 22:35 UTC, which can be explained by the locally enhanced aggregation and precipitation rate (Carlin & Ryzhkov, 2019; Li et al., 2020). In contrast, W‐band LDR shows less variation in the ML at these times.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even though detailed observations of the ML are performed using aircraft penetrations, they are limited to measurement campaigns and do not provide continuous records. Ground‐based radars have been widely employed for ML studies (e.g., Fabry & Zawadzki, 1995; Griffin et al., 2020; Kumjian et al., 2016; Li et al., 2020; Russchenberg & Ligthart, 1996; Trömel et al., 2019). However, radar interpretations of the ML are still challenging largely due to the uncertainties in microphysical processes that take place in the ML (Heymsfield et al., 2015) and how snowflake melting modifies particle physical (Leinonen & von Lerber, 2018) and scattering properties (Ori & Kneifel, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riming is an important snow growth process and has an impact on the physical properties of ice particles (Barthazy & Schefold, 2006; Erfani & Mitchell, 2016; Grazioli et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018; Moisseev et al., 2017). Riming can also impact the microphysical properties of the melting layer (Li & Moisseev, 2020; Li et al., 2020; Mroz et al., 2020) and rainfall below the melting layer (Lin et al., 2020; Sarma et al., 2016). Furthermore, riming is affected by anthropogenic aerosols (Borys et al., 2003; Jackson et al., 2012), which is also supported by the ECHAM4 general circulation model simulations (Lohmann, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the rime mass fraction (FR) was introduced and predicted in the predicted particle properties (P3) microphysical scheme, which can continuously quantify the degree of riming (Morrison & Grabowski, 2008; Morrison & Milbrandt, 2014). Previous studies have used FR to quantify the riming degree using ground‐based observations (Kneifel & Moisseev, 2020; Li et al., 2018, 2020; Moisseev et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst several studies have looked at the microphysical processes occurring within the melting layer (Drummond et al, 1996) and at the link between microphysical processes in snow above the freezing level and within the melting layer (Zawadzki et al (2005); Li et al (2020) and references therein), less attention has been paid to the analysis of quantitative relationships between ice microphysics just above the freezing level and rain microphysics just below the melting layer. This investigation can contribute to a holistic understanding of the chain of processes occurring in the cloud that lead to precipitation at the ground, which is key for model development but which may also help in better constraining full-column remote sensing retrievals, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%