2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10828-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Combination of Data Sets from Various Observation Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we additionally demonstrate that: (1) different observation types can be introduced into the evaluation model at the spectral level of their highest sensitivities, which makes it possible to benefit from the individual strengths of each data set optimally; (2) since all computations within the pyramid algorithm are based on linear equation systems (Schmidt et al 2015), all covariance information can easily be calculated following the law of error propagation from the higher levels and serve as input for the lower levels; (3) as the number of required SRBFs decreases from the highest level to the lower levels, the design matrices of the lowerresolution data sets are now calculated with a smaller number of grid points, which reduces the computational effort significantly. We test the MRR based on the pyramid algorithm by using simulated data and then apply it to real data in different study areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this research, we additionally demonstrate that: (1) different observation types can be introduced into the evaluation model at the spectral level of their highest sensitivities, which makes it possible to benefit from the individual strengths of each data set optimally; (2) since all computations within the pyramid algorithm are based on linear equation systems (Schmidt et al 2015), all covariance information can easily be calculated following the law of error propagation from the higher levels and serve as input for the lower levels; (3) as the number of required SRBFs decreases from the highest level to the lower levels, the design matrices of the lowerresolution data sets are now calculated with a smaller number of grid points, which reduces the computational effort significantly. We test the MRR based on the pyramid algorithm by using simulated data and then apply it to real data in different study areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast to the rigorous combination at one level J presented here, a spectral combination at different levels might optimize the results. We plan further investigations by applying a MRR (mentioned in section 3.1.5) and implementing a pyramid algorithm for a step‐by‐step combination of those observations [see Schmidt et al , ], which contribute most at corresponding resolution levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper combination of the excitation functions from GRACE and altimetry requires accounting for the different accuracy levels of the observation methods in the stochastic model. Traditionally, this is done by using variance component estimation (VCE) as outlined, e.g., by Koch [1999] or Schmidt et al [2012]. In our case, it seems not reasonable to apply VCE because we do not know the complete stochastic model of the gravimetric and altimetric input data.…”
Section: Combination and Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%