2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards sustainable product development – Insights from testing and evaluating a profile model for management of sustainability integration into design requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ strategically addressed. [17] A similar picture is seen in Sustainaible R&D portfolio assessments: here, environmental, social, and ethical values are included in portfolio development. [18] In order to design the individual products of the formed sustainable portfolios also sustainably, further steps are needed to operationalize them in the design process and to adapt the specific criteria to the industry and product area.…”
Section: Eco-designmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[ strategically addressed. [17] A similar picture is seen in Sustainaible R&D portfolio assessments: here, environmental, social, and ethical values are included in portfolio development. [18] In order to design the individual products of the formed sustainable portfolios also sustainably, further steps are needed to operationalize them in the design process and to adapt the specific criteria to the industry and product area.…”
Section: Eco-designmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results revealed that the majority of the SPD practices (59%) solely address the environmental pillar (e.g., "Identify the environmental hotspots and determine effective interventions" (Manzardo et al, 2021)). While 13% of the practices address social concerns (e.g., "Clarify and widen the scope of current sustainability policy, and other steering documents, to include a more comprehensive social commitment" (Watz and Hallstedt, 2022)), the economic pillar is addressed by only 9% of practices (e.g., "Effective prioritization process to ensure the projects that will deliver the greatest business value and environmental benefit" (Dekoninck et al, 2016)). It is also observed that 9% of the practices address environmental and social pillars in combination (e.g., "Include a holistic socio-ecological sustainability perspective and make sustainability risks tangible for the product developers" (Schulte and Knuts, 2022)) and 6% of the practices address both environmental and economic pillars (e.g., "Alignment of successive incremental eco-design improvements into viable development paths toward the development of circular and sustainable business models" (Mendoza et al, 2017)).…”
Section: Sustainability Dimensions Addressed By the Spd Management Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packaging design has given a comprehensive surge, considering multiple factors appropriate to the complexity of sustainability challenges [ 27 ]. Thereby, packaging design for sustainability exemplifies the fact that it is made up through multiple elements: the natural environment, society, and economic performance [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%