2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST) 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icitst.2009.5402633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards spatial awareness in recommender systems

Abstract: Recommender systems aggregate information about users and items to be recommended to generate adequate recommendations. This paper proposes two approaches to include information about spatial releationships of users and items in order to improve the quality of recommendations. The two approaches are compared with non-spatial recommendation using a set of evaluation metrics. Special ramp-up problems, occurring when including spatial information into recommender systems and different application areas for spatia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerably better results of the algorithm according to equation (4) when using data set 1 show that the algorithm is able to adapt to basic user preferences without distinct differences between the users. As already predicted in [15] these advantages dilute if more complex user behaviour is present, as within our data set 2. Here the results of the first spatial aware algorithm perform only as good as the non-spatial recommender system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The considerably better results of the algorithm according to equation (4) when using data set 1 show that the algorithm is able to adapt to basic user preferences without distinct differences between the users. As already predicted in [15] these advantages dilute if more complex user behaviour is present, as within our data set 2. Here the results of the first spatial aware algorithm perform only as good as the non-spatial recommender system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%