2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2012
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2012.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Social Version Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In existing systems that are used for version control purposes, the majority of current version control systems are centralized, meaning they have a single repository and are also managed by the authority that can manipulate or temper the repository's data. The disadvantages are that clients do not have unlimited oversight of the report or file, and that documents can be erased, controlled, or altered, which can cause havoc in the development process [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In existing systems that are used for version control purposes, the majority of current version control systems are centralized, meaning they have a single repository and are also managed by the authority that can manipulate or temper the repository's data. The disadvantages are that clients do not have unlimited oversight of the report or file, and that documents can be erased, controlled, or altered, which can cause havoc in the development process [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%