2018
DOI: 10.18517/ijaseit.8.4-2.6807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Serendipity for Content–Based Recommender Systems

Abstract: Recommender systems are intelligent applications build to predict the rating or preference that a user would give to an item. One of the fundamental recommendation methods in the content-based method that predict ratings by exploiting attributes about the users and items such as users' profile and textual content of items. A current issue faces by recommender systems based on this method is that the systems seem to recommend too similar items to what users have known. Thus, creating over-specialisation issues,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other potential future works include the addressing the elements of serendipity in recommendation. Exploiting friend's relationship is expected to improve elements of serendipity whereby items suggested are considered novel, relevant and unexpected [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other potential future works include the addressing the elements of serendipity in recommendation. Exploiting friend's relationship is expected to improve elements of serendipity whereby items suggested are considered novel, relevant and unexpected [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses external sources like Wikipedia to reveal hidden links between items and thus weight the edges linking them, the aim being to increase the likelihood that users will view recommendations made to them as non-obvious. As noted in [12] and [20], this method generates recommendations that are not biased towards popular items, but does not consider user preferences.…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is conducive to incorporating new items and exhibits transparency. However, it has certain limitations, such as the cold-start problem for users, restricted content analysis, and potential overspecialisation [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%