2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2009.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Secrecy for Rewriting in Weakly Adhesive Categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All vertical squares are known to be pullbacks, except for the rightmost square in the display above. However, reusing the proof idea of Proposition 4.4 of (Heindel, 2009), also this square can be shown to be a pullback. For arrows y ⊑ x in I, the relevant naturality square can similarly be shown to be a pullback, this time using the pushouts based on the I-objects z ⊓ y, u ⊓ y, v ⊓ y, y.…”
Section: Finite Objects As Vk-colimits Of Irreduciblesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All vertical squares are known to be pullbacks, except for the rightmost square in the display above. However, reusing the proof idea of Proposition 4.4 of (Heindel, 2009), also this square can be shown to be a pullback. For arrows y ⊑ x in I, the relevant naturality square can similarly be shown to be a pullback, this time using the pushouts based on the I-objects z ⊓ y, u ⊓ y, v ⊓ y, y.…”
Section: Finite Objects As Vk-colimits Of Irreduciblesmentioning
confidence: 94%