2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/irc.2018.00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Safe Speed and Separation Monitoring in Human-Robot Collaboration with 3D-Time-of-Flight Cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We showed that time-of-flight (ToF) sensors are suitable for this task. The first approaches used a camera mounted on the flange of the robot [17]. Further research investigated the use of single-pixel ToF sensors distributed over the links of the manipulator [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We showed that time-of-flight (ToF) sensors are suitable for this task. The first approaches used a camera mounted on the flange of the robot [17]. Further research investigated the use of single-pixel ToF sensors distributed over the links of the manipulator [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synchronization interval was set to 1 s. When the synchronized state was achieved, the trigger's position of the synchronizing camera is recorded using an oscilloscope. The necessary buffer is calculated using (2). With t overlap = 0.08 ms from the first…”
Section: Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this appendix, first, the stability of the tracking error defined in (3) is investigated under the design of (4). Taking the time derivative of (3) and then substituting (4) yields ė = Vd − Ĵ Ĵ * ( Vd + K p ē) (12) and utilizing (5a) results in…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%