2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards robust online inverse dynamics learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We support the proposed algorithm with an experimental validation on a compliant 6DoF robotic arm, shown in Figure 1, which makes use of low-power series elastic actuators [10]. The results demonstrate that the controller improves the tracking performance in terms of root mean square tracking error compared to a PID controller, the offset-free MPC scheme presented in [11], the nonlinear MPC scheme [12], and the three learning-based schemes presented in [13], [14]. In particular, the proposed controller reduces the root mean square tracking error by up to 53% compared with the bestpractice PID controller.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We support the proposed algorithm with an experimental validation on a compliant 6DoF robotic arm, shown in Figure 1, which makes use of low-power series elastic actuators [10]. The results demonstrate that the controller improves the tracking performance in terms of root mean square tracking error compared to a PID controller, the offset-free MPC scheme presented in [11], the nonlinear MPC scheme [12], and the three learning-based schemes presented in [13], [14]. In particular, the proposed controller reduces the root mean square tracking error by up to 53% compared with the bestpractice PID controller.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This allows for exponential smoothing of the GP hyperparameters, which increases the robustness of the GP at the cost of having slower reactiveness. Nevertheless, [17] does not provide a proof of the robust stability of the closed-loop system. In [18], the variance of the GP prediction is utilized to adapt the parameters of an outer-loop PD controller online, and the uniform ultimate boundedness of the tracking error is proved under some assumptions on the structure of the PD controller (e.g., the gain matrix was assumed to be diagonal, which imposes a decentralized gain control scheme).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Lyapunov function V is strictly decreasing outsidē B δ , the tracking error e(t) eventually reaches and remains in S δ ⊂B c , and so the tracking error e(t) is uniformly ultimately bounded, and its ultimate bound is the radius of B c . Note that from (17), B δ ⊂ {e ∈ R 2N : e T P e < e(0) T P e(0)} ⊂ D, and ρ is a correct upper bound on η . One can see that δ and hence the radius of B c depend on the choice of the design parameter .…”
Section: Theoretical Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement of accuracy in the modeling then directly converts into a reduction of gains for these controllers. This reduction consequently is a major objective and performance criterion for the success of such modeling approaches [14,16,18]. …”
Section: Hybrid Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%