2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57506-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Reuse of Synchronization Algorithms in Co-simulation Frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our proposed algorithm, implemented in the MaestroV2 framework (Thule et al 2020) 2 , always takes a predictable amount of wall clock time to advance in simulated time. The disadvantage is that there is a minimum bound on the error because changing the order does not replace the benefits of adjusting the communication step size.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed algorithm, implemented in the MaestroV2 framework (Thule et al 2020) 2 , always takes a predictable amount of wall clock time to advance in simulated time. The disadvantage is that there is a minimum bound on the error because changing the order does not replace the benefits of adjusting the communication step size.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introductiono ff rameworksh as become more and more popular to allowe asy "plugand-play" co-simulation. However, manyf rameworksh avea gain been designed motivated by as pecific problem or area of application, such as building simulation (Wetter 2011), automotives ystems (Zhang et al 2014) or traffic (Ferreirae ta l. 2008) and are limited to the co-simulation of certain tools,leaving gaps aimed to be filled by further developments.W hat is more is that these seemingly simple"enablers" of co-simulation bear the risk that systems are not properly checkedf or stability properties butr ashly coupled, which can be amended by notwithstandingm indful consideration and inspection of everyu ser.M anyr ecent, independent developments (Ben Khaled et al 2014;Galtier et al 2015;Thule et al 2019b;Wang et al 2017) respect the FMI standard. Awais (2015) even utilizes the HLA as well as the FMI, ford etails see below.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main focus of this work has been laid on the investigation of hierarchical co-simulation approaches.T hese,a se videnced by the results from Chapters 3a nd 5, have up to now barely been mentioned in the literature (cf.t he acknowledgement of co-simulations within a co-simulation by Thule et al (2019b) and Wang et al (2003)) and, even more importantly, not been investigated with regard to consistency or stability (confer Section 6.1). As explained at the beginning of Chapter 6, hierarchical approaches in general are no novelty in the area of modeling and simulation, see f.i.…”
Section: Summaryand Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common master algorithms are the Gauss-Seidel and Jacobi (the curious reader is referred to [8] for an overview of these algorithms and a survey on co-simulation). In this work, we use the open-source INTO-CPS tool-chain [11], for the design and execution of co-simulation multi-models, with Maestro [12] as orchestration engine employing an FMI-based Jacobi master algorithm.…”
Section: Concepts and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%