Towards resilient flood risk management for Asian coastal cities: Lessons learned from Hong Kong and Singapore

Abstract

Many coastal cities are experiencing growing risk to hydrological hazards through the combination of uncontrolled urban development and exposure to natural phenomena linked to climate change, including rising sea levels, intensified storms, and amplified storm surges. This growing risk is particularly acute in Asian coastal megacities, many of which have yet to develop adequate adaptation policies to address plausible impacts of climate change. In this analysis, we review how Hong Kong and Singapore, two of the most affluent coastal cities in East Asia, have initiated many flood mitigation strategies policies that have allowed them to reduce the impacts flooding. These strategies, once relying largely on building flood control structures, have now evolved to include holistic flood risk management approaches that include socioeconomic factors. Arguably these two success stories provide inspiration for other coastal Asian cities. However, as climate change and uncontrolled development are likely to increase urban flooding in the future, general improvements could be made to improve knowledge transfer: e.g., develop means to work across policy silos and strike compromises between conflicting sectoral responsibilities, and develop long-term integrated strategies using planning tools and practices to address growing risk. While knowledge transfer cannot be direct because of different geographical settings, socio-economic situations, and political situations, we encourage governments to look beyond engineering-based flood control structures as to develop flood governance programs. Towards resilient flood risk management for Asian coastal cities: lessons

Perception of Disasters and Land Reclamation in an Informal Settlement on Reclaimed Land: Case of the BASECO Compound, Manila, the Philippines

“…Disaster risk reduction strategies that rely heavily on infrastructure can fail to address the root causes of disasters in Southeast Asian countries, as they collide with immediate development needs such as economic growth and development (Miller and Douglass 2016). Reliance on awareness raising as a motivator to demand expenditure on defense infrastructure by the government does not capture the intricacies of vulnerability prevalent in impoverished coastal communities, such as the need to care for everyday needs (Ballinger 2015;Douglass 2016;Chan et al 2018). Informal settlers live in a constant state of risk, and using future potential disasters (which is another form of risk) as a reason for relocating them to a safer place cannot compete with more urgent everyday needs.…”

Determinants of establishment success: Comparing alien and native freshwater fishes in Taiwan

“…Consequently, we emphasize two management approaches suggested by previous studies: (1) an adequate biosecurity management for aquaculture farm facilities such as increasing pond embankment height or constructing containment structures to prevent escape events during flooding [41], and (2) a reduction in freshwater aquaculture [42]. Given the co-occurrences of increased aquaculture [43] and increasing flooding risks in Asia [44,45] in recent years, there two management suggestions should also be considered for other Asian countries with extensive freshwater aquaculture.…”

Failing adaptation in island contexts: the growing need for transformational change

“…While this failure is rarely admitted explicitly (Piggott-McKellar, McNamara, Nunn, & Watson, 2019), it is manifest from considering the lack of awareness and indecision that typically characterises environmental governance in most such situationssomething that would not be expected had adaptation been effectively mainstreamed (Patt & Schroter, 2008;Paton & Fairbairn-Dunlop, 2010;Chandra & Gaganis, 2016;Scott-Parker & Kumar, 2018). In richer ('developed') island contexts, the current situation is understandably different, with many such coastlinesfrom Oahu (Hawaii) to Singaporemarked by costly coastal-engineering solutions that armour exposed coasts (Romine & Fletcher, 2012;Chan, Chuah, Ziegler, Dabrowski, & Varis, 2018). Yet notwithstanding the availability of resources, the tendency of decision-makers to 'protect' island shorelines to allow a continuation of coastal livingrather than consider relocationspeaks to both the almostuniversal desire of coastal dwellers to remain living on coasts and to the short-term political/societal gains associated with implementing a 'protect' strategy.…”