Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3325480.3325510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Reframing Codenames for Computational Modelling and Creativity Support using Associative Creativity Principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If comRAT-V could solve the visual RAT, it would be interesting from a computational perspective to obtain a secondary measurement for the associative process in CreaCogs, in a form of a different task. Our initial work in the direction of a second task is the Codenames board game (Zunjani and Olteteanu, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If comRAT-V could solve the visual RAT, it would be interesting from a computational perspective to obtain a secondary measurement for the associative process in CreaCogs, in a form of a different task. Our initial work in the direction of a second task is the Codenames board game (Zunjani and Olteteanu, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method (Zunjani & Olteteanu, 2019) proposes a formalization of the Codenames task using a knowledge graph, but does not provide an implementation of their proposed recursive traversal algorithm. We found that recursive traversal does not scale to the computation required to run repeated evaluations of Codenames -for each blue word b, we must find each associated word w in the knowledge base that has similarity s(w, b) greater than some threshold t, and repeat this process every trial.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, since evaluations from bots may not represent human judgments, our human evaluation is more realistic and extensive, conducted through Amazon Mechanical Turk with 1,440 total samples. Another method (Zunjani & Olteteanu, 2019) proposes a formalization of the Codenames task using a knowledge graph, but does not provide an implementation of their proposed recursive traversal algorithm. We found that recursive traversal does not scale to the computation required to run repeated evaluations of Codenames -for each blue word, we must find each associated word w in the knowledge base that have Association w,b greater than some threshold t, and repeat this process every trial.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%