Towards reference dosimetry for the MR-linac: magnetic field correction of the ionization chamber reading

Abstract

In the UMC Utrecht a prototype MR-linac has been installed. The system consists of a 6 MV Elekta (Crawley, UK) linear accelerator and a 1.5 T Philips (Best, The Netherlands) Achieva MRI system. This paper investigates the feasibility to correct the ionization chamber reading for the magnetic field within the dosimetry calibration method described by Almond et al (1999 Med. Phys. 26 1847-70). Firstly, the feasibility of using an ionization chamber in an MR-linac was assessed by investigating possible influences of the magnetic field on NE2571 Farmer-type ionization chamber characteristics: linearity, repeatability, orientation in the magnetic field; and AAPM TG51 correction factor for voltage polarity and ion recombination. We found that these AAPM correction factors for the NE2571 chamber were not influenced by the magnetic field. Secondly, the influence of the permanent 1.5 T magnetic field on the NE2571 chamber reading was quantified. The reading is influenced by the magnetic field; therefore, a correction factor has been added. For the standardized setup used in this paper, the NE2571 chamber reading increases by 4.9% (± 0.2%) due to the transverse 1.5 T magnetic field. Dosimetry measurements in an MR-linac are feasible, if a setup-specific magnetic field correction factor (P1.5 T) for the charge reading is introduced. For the setup investigated in this paper, the P1.5 T has a value of 0.953.

MR‐linac is the best modality for lung SBRT

“…[14][15][16][17][18] While the integration has finally been made feasible after decades of R&Ds, the linac component in an MR-linac is still not up to the highest standard of modern linacs. [14][15][16][17][18] While the integration has finally been made feasible after decades of R&Ds, the linac component in an MR-linac is still not up to the highest standard of modern linacs.…”

Experimental analysis of correction factors for reference dosimetry in a magnetic field

“…The correction factor (k B ) was calculated using equation 1 ( ) where M 0 is the measured signal without the magnetic field and M B is the measured signal in the presence of the magnetic field [2]. The measured signal was corrected for temperature and air pressure respectively.…”

Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technical Review

“…While CT is the workhorse in this arena, MR offers better soft tissue contrast and therefore might help to better pinpoint the radiation beam to cancer while sparing normal tissue in, for example, prostate cancer 65–69 . Indeed, there is growing interest in coupling radiation therapy’s linear accelerators with MR scanners 70–72 .…”